Will the Instance registered by Bind.lazyPut not be deleted?

[zhao004]

Describe the bug

Will the Instance registered by Bind.lazyPut not be deleted?
Will this affect performance? Is there a way to delete the Instance registered by Bind.lazyPut from memory?

Screenshots

Flutter Version:

Flutter 3.24.5 • channel stable • https://github.com/flutter/flutter.git
Framework • revision dec2ee5c1f (3 weeks ago) • 2024-11-13 11:13:06 -0800
Engine • revision a18df97ca5
Tools • Dart 3.5.4 • DevTools 2.37.3

Getx Version:

[Enter the version of the Getx you are using](get: ^5.0.0-release-candidate-9.2.1)

[ZhuJHua]

same question

[vtmnetdev]

@zhao004 (Workaround) I found that, if you add 'fenix: false' when using Bind.lazyPut, the controller will be deleted on closing.

[ZhuJHua]

(Workaround) I found that, if you add 'fenix: false' when using Bind.lazyPut, the controller will be deleted on closing.

So why the Bind set the fenix to true as default? I find that in Get.lazyPut, the fenix is false as default.

[jonataslaw]

Thanks for opening this issue.
The problem is with the fenix:true mode setting in the last update.
I'm still deciding if it will be the default.
Many users face problems with dependency not found (although this always happens when they use GetX improperly, starting dependencies in inappropriate places) but performance should be in mind along with ease of use.

[ZhuJHua]

Thanks for opening this issue. The problem is with the fenix:true mode setting in the last update. I'm still deciding if it will be the default. Many users face problems with dependency not found (although this always happens when they use GetX improperly, starting dependencies in inappropriate places) but performance should be in mind along with ease of use.

Should I assume that I can set fenix to false for all Bind.lazyPut and get the same effect as Get.lazyPut?

[jonataslaw]

Yes, definetely

[ZhuJHua]

Yes, definetely

Thanks for your response.