License
#28
Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi @galleon, yes, LGPL is indeed an option. I will try to change the license for future releases. You can count on that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
FYI, it is LGPL now 🎉 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi @junzis!
May I understand the reason for going for GPL license? I am part of a group working on
scikit-decide
a platform for planning and scheduling and it would make sense to have an example working with OpenAP but your license is contaminating. Our license isMIT
.At least,
LGPL
would be more friendly for us.Cheers
Guillaume
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions