Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

flag for not deleting individual snapshots when a volumegroupsnapshot is deleted #1126

Open
jmccormick2001 opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@jmccormick2001
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem?/Why is this needed
I notice that when I delete a volume group snapshot, and DeleteVolumeGroupSnapshot() is called, that the snapshotter calls ControllerDeleteSnapshot() for each snapshot belonging to the volume group. For some storage devices, removing a volume group causes the underlying/associated snapshots to be removed in an atomic fashion without having to remove each snapshot individually.

Describe the solution you'd like in detail
I would like some way to turn off the default behavior of having calls to ControllerDeleteSnapshot() for each snapshot when DeleteVolumeGroupSnapshot() is invoked. This way, I can have our storage device be responsible for removing each associated snapshot.

Describe alternatives you've considered
One alternative is to make our storage device APi call specify that we do not want the storage device to cleanup or remove the dependent snapshots.

Additional context

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

We need to discuss more about this as this would require a CSI spec change.

cc @bswartz

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmccormick2001 Can you please provide logs? DeleteVolumeGroupSnapshot should not cause ControllerDeleteSnapshot() to really delete the individual snapshot. It should be skipped quickly. If not, there is a bug that we need to fix.

@jmccormick2001
Copy link
Author

jmccormick2001 commented Sep 4, 2024

sure, attached is the driver log that shows the calls to ControllerDeleteSnapshot(). Here is how I'm recreating this:

  1. create VolumeGroupSnapshotClass
  2. create 2 iscsi volumes/PVCs
  3. apply a label 'mygroup' to the PVCs
  4. create a VolumeGroupSnapshot that selects the 2 PVCs using the label

driver.log

That all works as expected, I see the snapshots on our storage device as planned. Then I delete the VolumeGroupSnapshot to trigger the deletion. The delete of the VolumeGroupSnapshot works as expected, but notice what is going on in the driver log, it calls ControllerDeleteSnapshot() twice, one for each PVC/volume.

I suspect this is by design, but we have a feature on the storage device that is a single call, that essentially says, delete the entire snap group in an atomic fashion instead of individually deleting snapshots one-by-one that are included in the group.

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

We are supposed to skip the CSI driver call to delete individual snapshots in this PR but I think we missed it: #972.
We can add a check in syncContent() not to call the CSI driver if VolumeSnapshotContent status has a VolumeGroupSnapshotHandle: https://github.com/kubernetes-csi/external-snapshotter/blob/v8.1.0/pkg/sidecar-controller/snapshot_controller.go#L63

https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/d9fc500581dddf2debeb168d6bfef62a68c35a70/keps/sig-storage/3476-volume-group-snapshot/README.md#delete-volumegroupsnapshot

@manishym
Copy link
Contributor

manishym commented Sep 5, 2024

/assign

@mowangdk
Copy link
Contributor

We also encountered this problem when we verified GroupVolumeSnapshot, looking forward this to be resolved~

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants