Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Generate role binding based on generated role #839

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Anddd7
Copy link

@Anddd7 Anddd7 commented Aug 1, 2023

Generate RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding based on the generated roles.

In kubebuilder.role_binding.go#L44, it initilized the rolebinding as a static template which only contains ClusterRoleBinding. So we need to edit it manually and it's not auto-updated if you add Role instead of ClusterRole.

fix #760

(BTW, in kubebuilder.role_binding.go#L44, there are several labels generated in template. To keep consistent with other resources, do we need to add it for role/role_binding as well?
(One solution is using kustomize#LabelTransformer or kustomize#patches, which only changes the yaml templates

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @Anddd7!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-tools 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-tools has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Anddd7. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Anddd7
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign alvaroaleman for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 1, 2023
@Anddd7 Anddd7 force-pushed the generate-role-binding branch from 11272ce to bd103d1 Compare August 1, 2023 06:10
@Anddd7 Anddd7 changed the title RBAC: Generate role binding based on generated role Generate role binding based on generated role Aug 1, 2023
@Anddd7
Copy link
Author

Anddd7 commented Aug 1, 2023

/retitle ✨ Generate role binding based on generated role

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Anddd7: Re-titling can only be requested by trusted users, like repository collaborators.

In response to this:

/retitle ✨ Generate role binding based on generated role

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Anddd7 Anddd7 changed the title Generate role binding based on generated role ✨ Generate role binding based on generated role Aug 1, 2023
},
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: fmt.Sprintf("%sbinding", roleName),
Namespace: role.Namespace,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, I just got into the issue you refer to in this PR. Is the kustomize namespace replacement considered here? If I manually generate a role like this in my case, the namespace would be replaced with the one set in the main kustomization.yaml file.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This 'controller-tools' is mainly used to parse the annotations of kubebuilder and generate the manifest, no kustomization.

Ref the kubebuilder, it do have kustomization, https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/pkg/plugins/common/kustomize/v2/scaffolds/internal/templates/config/rbac/kustomization.go.

If we want to overwrite the namespace, i prefer to use an additional config of https://kubectl.docs.kubernetes.io/references/kustomize/builtins/#_namespacetransformer.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you stating that you would change how the namespace is set by the projects consuming controller-runtime (kube-builder, operator-sdk, ...) as a follow-up that uses something like unsetOnly: true and setRoleBindingSubjects: allServiceAccounts?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 26, 2024
@Anddd7 Anddd7 closed this Jan 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Role and Clusterrole binding are not generated correctly
4 participants