From 428b4c6f6cfe6c824e41d2dc59b93895f3aa35fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Wright Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 15:02:46 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] misc documentation updates --- man/ansari.wheat.uniformity.Rd | 8 ++-- man/arankacami.groundnut.uniformity.Rd | 2 +- man/bailey.cotton.uniformity.Rd | 9 ++++- man/baker.strawberry.uniformity.Rd | 35 +++++++++++------- man/bancroft.peanut.uniformity.Rd | 2 +- man/batchelor.uniformity.Rd | 7 +++- man/bose.multi.uniformity.Rd | 2 +- man/bradley.multi.uniformity.Rd | 3 +- man/bryan.corn.uniformity.Rd | 4 +- man/coombs.rice.uniformity.Rd | 2 +- man/day.wheat.uniformity.Rd | 4 +- man/ducker.groundnut.uniformity.Rd | 2 +- man/evans.sugarcane.uniformity.Rd | 1 + man/garber.multi.uniformity.Rd | 49 +++++++++++++++++-------- man/gregory.cotton.Rd | 2 +- man/grover.diallel.Rd | 2 +- man/hansen.multi.uniformity.Rd | 2 + man/haritonenko.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd | 14 +++---- man/harris.multi.uniformity.Rd | 6 ++- man/hartman.tomato.uniformity.Rd | 9 ++++- man/holtsmark.timothy.uniformity.Rd | 3 +- man/jones.corn.uniformity.Rd | 3 ++ man/kalamkar.potato.uniformity.Rd | 14 +++++-- man/lehmann.millet.uniformity.Rd | 8 ++-- man/love.cotton.uniformity.Rd | 22 ++++++++--- man/masood.rice.uniformity.Rd | 3 ++ man/mcclelland.corn.uniformity.Rd | 6 +++ man/mercer.mangold.uniformity.Rd | 6 ++- man/mercer.wheat.uniformity.Rd | 3 ++ man/nair.turmeric.uniformity.Rd | 4 +- man/obsi.potato.uniformity.Rd | 15 ++++---- man/odland.soybean.uniformity.Rd | 26 +++++++------ man/parker.orange.uniformity.Rd | 6 +-- man/polson.safflower.uniformity.Rd | 2 +- man/roemer.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd | 42 ++++++++++++++++----- man/shafi.tomato.uniformity.Rd | 11 ++++-- man/steptoe.morex.pheno.Rd | 2 +- man/vargas.wheat1.Rd | 29 ++++++++------- man/wassom.brome.uniformity.Rd | 2 +- man/wyatt.multi.uniformity.Rd | 10 +++-- 40 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/ansari.wheat.uniformity.Rd b/man/ansari.wheat.uniformity.Rd index a2e215af..efd32153 100644 --- a/man/ansari.wheat.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/ansari.wheat.uniformity.Rd @@ -24,12 +24,12 @@ "Wheat was sown over an area of 180 ft. x 243 ft. with 324 rows on a field of average fertility. It had wheat during 1938-39 rabi and was fallow during 1939-40 kharif. The seed was sown behind desi plough in - rows 9 in. apart, the length of each row being 180 ft". + rows 9 inches apart, the length of each row being 180 feet". - "At the time of harvest, 18 rows on both sides and 10 ft. at the end of + "At the time of harvest, 18 rows on both sides and 10 feet at the end of the field were discarded to eliminate border effects and an area of - 160 ft. x 216 ft. with 288 rows was harvested in small units, each - being 2 ft. 3 in. broad with three rows 20 ft. long. There were 96 + 160 feet x 216 feet with 288 rows was harvested in small units, each + being 2 feet 3 inches broad with three rows 20 feet long. There were 96 units across the rows and eight units along the rows. The total number of unit plots thus obtained was 768. The yield of grain for each unit plot was weighed and recorded separately and is given in the appendix." diff --git a/man/arankacami.groundnut.uniformity.Rd b/man/arankacami.groundnut.uniformity.Rd index bedde292..1218b498 100644 --- a/man/arankacami.groundnut.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/arankacami.groundnut.uniformity.Rd @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Ira Arankacami, R. Rangaswamy. (1995). A Text Book of Agricultural Statistics. New Age International Publishers. - Table 19.1. + Table 19.1. Page 237. https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_Text_Book_of_Agricultural_Statistics/QDLWE4oakSgC } \references{ diff --git a/man/bailey.cotton.uniformity.Rd b/man/bailey.cotton.uniformity.Rd index aa3ff620..57046bd8 100644 --- a/man/bailey.cotton.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/bailey.cotton.uniformity.Rd @@ -29,11 +29,18 @@ Add 1.5m for irrigation channel. Center-to-center distances 15m x 8.5m. - Chart 1: Sakha 1921, 8 x 20. Length 20 ridges * .75 m = 15m. Width = 7m. + Charts 3 & 5 show yield of "Selected Average Plants". These data are + not used here. + + Chart 1: Sakha 1921, 8 x 20. Bed yield in rotls. Length 20 ridges * .75 m = 15m. Width = 7m. Chart 2: Gemmeiza 1921, 8 x 20. + + Chart 3: Total S.A.P. yield in grams. (not used here) Chart 4: Gemmeiza 1922, 8 x 20. + + Chart 5: Total S.A.P. yield in grams. (not used here) Layout at Giza (page 10) diff --git a/man/baker.strawberry.uniformity.Rd b/man/baker.strawberry.uniformity.Rd index a85b47e1..6ab2279c 100644 --- a/man/baker.strawberry.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/baker.strawberry.uniformity.Rd @@ -11,23 +11,35 @@ \format{ A data frame with 700 observations on the following 4 variables. \describe{ - \item{\code{trial}}{a factor with levels \code{T1} \code{T2}} - \item{\code{row}}{a numeric vector} - \item{\code{col}}{a numeric vector} - \item{\code{yield}}{a numeric vector} + \item{\code{trial}}{Factor for trial} + \item{\code{row}}{row ordinate} + \item{\code{col}}{column ordinate} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield per plant/plot in grams} } } \details{ - In trial T1, 200 plants were grown in two double-row beds at Davis, - CA, in 1946. The rows were 1 foot apart. The beds were 42 inches + + Trial T1: + + 200 plants were grown in two double-row beds at Davis, + California, in 1946. The rows were 1 foot apart. The beds were 42 inches apart. The plants were 10 inches apart within a row, each row consisting of 50 plants. Field length: 50 plants * 10 inches = 500 inches. - Field width: 12 in + 42 in + 12 in = + Field width: 12 in + 42 in + 12 in = 66 inches. + + The layout of the experiment in Table 1 shows 4 columns. + There is 12 inches between column 1 and column 2, then 42 inches, + then 12 inches between column 3 and column 4. + For the data in this R package, we added 3 to the right two columns + index values to indicate this layout. + (Should be 3.5, but we want to have an integer). - In trial T2, 500 plants were grown in single beds. The beds were 30 + Trial T2: + + 500 plants were grown in single beds. The beds were 30 inches apart. Each bed was 50 plants long with 10 inches between plants. @@ -57,15 +69,12 @@ libs(dplyr) dat <- group_by(dat, trial) summarize(dat, mn=mean(yield), cv=sd(yield)/mean(yield)) -dat <- mutate(dat, col = ifelse(trial=="T1" & col==4, 7, col), - col = ifelse(trial=="T1" & col==3, 6, col)) - libs(desplot) desplot(dat, yield ~ col*row, subset=trial=="T1", - flip=TRUE, aspect=500/(5*12), + flip=TRUE, aspect=500/66, tick=TRUE, main="baker.strawberry.uniformity - trial T1") desplot(dat, yield ~ col*row, subset=trial=="T2", - flip=TRUE, aspect=500/300, + flip=TRUE, aspect=500/300, tick=TRUE, main="baker.strawberry.uniformity - trial T2") } diff --git a/man/bancroft.peanut.uniformity.Rd b/man/bancroft.peanut.uniformity.Rd index 20006330..18b826ff 100644 --- a/man/bancroft.peanut.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/bancroft.peanut.uniformity.Rd @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row} \item{\code{col}}{column} - \item{\code{yield}}{yield, pounds} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield, pounds per plot} \item{\code{block}}{block} } } diff --git a/man/batchelor.uniformity.Rd b/man/batchelor.uniformity.Rd index 53695be9..ad221924 100644 --- a/man/batchelor.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/batchelor.uniformity.Rd @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row} \item{\code{col}}{column} - \item{\code{yield}}{yield per tree (pounds)} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield per tree in pounds} } } \details{ @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ The following details are from Batchelor (1918). + \bold{Jonathan Apples} "The apple records were obtained from a 10-year old @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ Field length: 26 trees * 24 feet = 624 feet + \bold{Navel 1 at Arlington} These records were of the 1915-16 yields of one thousand 24-year-old @@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ Field length: 50 trees * 22 feet = 1100 feet + \bold{Navel 2 at Antelope} The navel-orange grove later referred to as the Antelope Heights @@ -95,6 +98,7 @@ Field length: 33 trees * 22 feet = 726 feet + \bold{Valencia Orange} The Valencia orange grove is composed of 240 15-year-old trees, @@ -105,6 +109,7 @@ Field length: 20 rows * 22 feet = 440 feet + \bold{Walnut} The walnut (Juglans regia) yields were obtained during the seasons of diff --git a/man/bose.multi.uniformity.Rd b/man/bose.multi.uniformity.Rd index 733a776e..abff0a6d 100644 --- a/man/bose.multi.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/bose.multi.uniformity.Rd @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ \item{\code{crop}}{crop} \item{\code{row}}{row ordinate} \item{\code{col}}{column ordinate} - \item{\code{yield}}{plot yield, grams} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield per plot in grams} } } \details{ diff --git a/man/bradley.multi.uniformity.Rd b/man/bradley.multi.uniformity.Rd index 9b7591e7..5968cb6e 100644 --- a/man/bradley.multi.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/bradley.multi.uniformity.Rd @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ P. L. Bradley (1941). A study of the variation in productivity over a number of fixed plots in field 2. Dissertation: The University of the West Indies. Appendix 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d. - https://hdl.handle.net/2139/41264 + https://uwispace.sta.uwi.edu/items/e874561d-52e5-4e39-8416-ff8c1756049c + https://hdl.handle.net/2139/41259 The data are repeated in: C. E. Wilson. diff --git a/man/bryan.corn.uniformity.Rd b/man/bryan.corn.uniformity.Rd index 70b92351..86c1447c 100644 --- a/man/bryan.corn.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/bryan.corn.uniformity.Rd @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ } \details{ Three varieties of corn were planted. - Each experiment was 48 rows, each row 48 hills long, .65 acres. (A - "hill" is a single hole with possibly multiple seeds). + Each experiment was 48 rows, each row 48 hills long, .65 acres. + A "hill" is a single hole with possibly multiple seeds. Spacing between the hills would be sqrt(43560 sq ft * .64) / 48 = 3.5 feet. In the experiment code, K=Krug, I=Iodent, M=McCulloch (varieties of diff --git a/man/coombs.rice.uniformity.Rd b/man/coombs.rice.uniformity.Rd index 6da49202..bb0a5d9c 100644 --- a/man/coombs.rice.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/coombs.rice.uniformity.Rd @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row} \item{\code{col}}{column} - \item{\code{yield}}{yield in gantangs} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield in gantangs per plot} } } \details{ diff --git a/man/day.wheat.uniformity.Rd b/man/day.wheat.uniformity.Rd index 38b301f2..476026d3 100644 --- a/man/day.wheat.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/day.wheat.uniformity.Rd @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ Uniformity trial of wheat in 1903 in Missouri. \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row} \item{\code{col}}{col} - \item{\code{grain}}{grain weight, grams} - \item{\code{straw}}{straw weight, grams} + \item{\code{grain}}{grain weight, grams per plot} + \item{\code{straw}}{straw weight, grams per plot} } } diff --git a/man/ducker.groundnut.uniformity.Rd b/man/ducker.groundnut.uniformity.Rd index eb30de56..2b280cf6 100644 --- a/man/ducker.groundnut.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/ducker.groundnut.uniformity.Rd @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ \alias{ducker.groundnut.uniformity} \docType{data} \title{ -Uniformity trial of groundnut. +Uniformity trial of groundnut } \description{ Uniformity trial of groundnut. diff --git a/man/evans.sugarcane.uniformity.Rd b/man/evans.sugarcane.uniformity.Rd index 82e10f9d..e1da0295 100644 --- a/man/evans.sugarcane.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/evans.sugarcane.uniformity.Rd @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ } \details{ A field of ratoon canes was harvested in 20-hole plots. + Described in a letter to Frank Yates written 21 May 1935. Field length: 5 plots x 50 feet (20 stools per plot; 30 inches between stools) = 250 feet diff --git a/man/garber.multi.uniformity.Rd b/man/garber.multi.uniformity.Rd index 27af1338..9cc3c467 100644 --- a/man/garber.multi.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/garber.multi.uniformity.Rd @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row} \item{\code{col}}{column} - \item{\code{oats}}{yield of oat hay, pounds} + \item{\code{oats}}{yield of oat hay, pounds per acre} \item{\code{wheat}}{yield of wheat grain, bu} } } @@ -24,33 +24,47 @@ all sides, the harvested area was 61 feet x 14 feet. The plots were laid out in doubles with a 14-foot roadway between the plots. - Note: The orientation of the plots is a guess. + Note: The orientation of the plots (68x21) is an educated guess. + If the orientation was 21x68, the field would be extremely narrow and + long. Field width: 6 plots * 68 feet + 14 ft/roadway * 2 = 436 feet Field length: 45 plots * 21 feet/plot = 945 feet - In 1923 the field was planted to oats and harvested as hay. - - In 1924 the field was planted to wheat and harvested for grain. - - Garber: "Plots 211 to 214, and 261 to 264, [note, these are rows + Garber said: "Plots 211 to 214, and 261 to 264, [note, these are rows 11-14, columns 5-6] inclusive, were eliminated from this study because of the fact that a few years ago a straw stack had stood on or in the vicinity...which undoubtedly accounts for the relatively high yields on plots 261 to 264, inclusive." - Note: The source document contained mean-subtracted yields. The oat + + 1923 results + + In 1923 the field was planted to oats and harvested as hay. + + The data for the oat hay was given in Table 5 as mean-subtracted + yields in pounds per acre for each plot. The oat yield in row 22, column 5 was given as +59.7. This is obviously incorrect, since the negative yields all end in '.7' and positive yields all ended in '.3'. We used -59.7 as the centered yield value - and added the mean of 1883.7 to all centered yields to obtain absolute - yields. + and added the mean of 1883.7 (p. 259) to all centered yields to obtain + absolute yields. - Note: Another paper by these authors, - "A Method of Laying Out Experimental Plats", contains three additional - years of uniformity trials, with each crop expressed as a percentage. - https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.229753?q=method+of+laying+out+experiment+plats + + 1924 results + + In 1924 the field was planted to winter wheat and harvested for grain. + + The data for the wheat was given in bushels per acre, expressed as + deviations from the mean yield (15.6 bu). + We added the mean to all plot data. + + + Note, Garber et al (1926) and Garber et al (1931) describe uniformity + trials from the same field, but the experimental plot numbers in the + two papers are different, indicating different parts of the field. + } \source{ Garber, R.J. and Mcllvaine, T.C. and Hoover, M.M. 1926. @@ -58,7 +72,12 @@ Jour Agr Res, 33, 255-268. Tables 3, 5. https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/IND43967148/PDF } - +\references{ + Garber, R. J. and T. C. McIlvaine and M. M. Hoover (1931). + A Method of Laying Out Experimental Plats. + Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 23, 286-298, + https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.229753/page/n299 +} \examples{ \dontrun{ diff --git a/man/gregory.cotton.Rd b/man/gregory.cotton.Rd index 1715e250..c0f238c6 100644 --- a/man/gregory.cotton.Rd +++ b/man/gregory.cotton.Rd @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ \format{ A data frame with 144 observations on the following 6 variables. \describe{ - \item{\code{yield}}{a numeric vector} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield} \item{\code{year}}{year} \item{\code{nitrogen}}{nitrogen level} \item{\code{date}}{sowing date} diff --git a/man/grover.diallel.Rd b/man/grover.diallel.Rd index 048ac05d..bbfeac84 100644 --- a/man/grover.diallel.Rd +++ b/man/grover.diallel.Rd @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ \format{ A data frame with 144 observations on the following 5 variables. \describe{ - \item{\code{yield}}{a numeric vector} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield value} \item{\code{rep}}{a character vector} \item{\code{parent1}}{a character vector} \item{\code{parent2}}{a character vector} diff --git a/man/hansen.multi.uniformity.Rd b/man/hansen.multi.uniformity.Rd index fac9f0b5..e269474e 100644 --- a/man/hansen.multi.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/hansen.multi.uniformity.Rd @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alen_(unit_of_length) The Danish alen = 62.77 cm. + Field A2: Based on the map, the field is approximately 60 alen x 70 alen (38 m x @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ excess lay in row 3 and eventually it was decided to reduce plots 3c to 96 and 3f to 84. + Field E2: Field is approximately 120 alen x 200 alen (76m x 125m). Plots are diff --git a/man/haritonenko.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd b/man/haritonenko.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd index 173b7b57..f713be29 100644 --- a/man/haritonenko.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/haritonenko.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd @@ -18,15 +18,11 @@ } \details{ - Roemer (1920) says: Haritonenko (36), Versuch der landwirtschaftlichen - Versuchsstation Iwanowskoje, Gouvernement Nowgorod. Versuchsfläche 5 - ha 68 a mit 416 Teilstücken zu 136,5 qm. Die Reihe 1 weist erheblich - geringeren Boden auf als die drei anderen Reihen. - - Translated: Haritonenko (36), experiment at Ivanovskoye Agricultural - Experimental Station, Novgorod Governorate. Test area 5.68 ha with - 416 sections (plots) of 136.5 square meters. Row 1 has significantly - less soil than the other three rows. + Roemer (1920) says: Haritonenko (36), experiment at Ivanovskoye Agricultural + Experimental Station, Novgorod Governorate. + The test area was 5.68 ha with 416 sections (plots) of 136.5 square + meters. + Row 1 has significantly less soil than the other three rows. Based on the heatmap, 'Row 1' is the left column. diff --git a/man/harris.multi.uniformity.Rd b/man/harris.multi.uniformity.Rd index f1065896..bbf26b38 100644 --- a/man/harris.multi.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/harris.multi.uniformity.Rd @@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ Field length: 23 plots * 23.3 feet = 536 feet - All yields are given in pound per plot. + All yields here are given in pound per plot. The original data in Harris (1920) for the 1911 sugarbeet yields were in tons/ac, (Harris 1920, table 3 footnote), but these were converted - to pounds/plot for the purpose of this dataset. given in tons per acre. + to pounds/plot for the purpose of this dataset. Harris (1928) shows a map of the location on page 16. @@ -119,12 +119,14 @@ Jour. Agr. Res, 20, 335-356. https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/IND43966236 https://www.google.com/books/edition/Journal_of_the_American_Society_of_Agron/Zwz0AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA257 + This has the data for 1911-1919. Harris, J Arthur and Scofield, CS. (1928). Further studies on the permanence of differences in the plots of an experimental field. Jour. Agr. Res, 36, 15--40. https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/IND43967538 + This has the data for 1920-1925. } \examples{ diff --git a/man/hartman.tomato.uniformity.Rd b/man/hartman.tomato.uniformity.Rd index 7eedb407..f4f5f7f3 100644 --- a/man/hartman.tomato.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/hartman.tomato.uniformity.Rd @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ } \details{ Grown in Indiana in 1941. + + The column ordinates in this R package dataset are not quite exactly + the same as in the field due to the presence of roads. + Plants were spaced 3 feet apart in rows 6 feet apart, 330 feet long. Each row was divided into 3 sections of 34 plants sparated by strips 12 feet long to provide roadways for vehicles. @@ -50,7 +54,8 @@ \source{ J. D. Hartman and E. C. Stair (1942). Field Plot Technique With Tomatoes. - Proceedings Of The American Society For Horticultural Science, 41, 315-320. + Proceedings Of The American Society For Horticultural Science, 41, + 315-320. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.240678 } \references{ @@ -63,7 +68,7 @@ library(agridat) data(hartman.tomato.uniformity) libs(desplot) desplot(hartman.tomato.uniformity, yield ~ col*row, - flip=TRUE, aspect=192/330, # true aspect + flip=TRUE, tick=TRUE, aspect=192/330, # true aspect main="hartman.tomato.uniformity") } diff --git a/man/holtsmark.timothy.uniformity.Rd b/man/holtsmark.timothy.uniformity.Rd index c607d4db..1ab1be1d 100644 --- a/man/holtsmark.timothy.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/holtsmark.timothy.uniformity.Rd @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Holtsmark, G and Larsen, BR (1905). Om Muligheder for at indskraenke de Fejl, som ved Markforsog betinges af Jordens Uensartethed. Tidsskrift for Landbrugets Planteavl. 12, 330-351. (In Danish) + Data on page 347. https://books.google.com/books?id=MdM0AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA330 https://dca.au.dk/publikationer/historiske/planteavl/ @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ } \references{ Theodor Roemer (1920). - Der Feldversuch. + Der Feldversuch. Page 67, table 11. } \examples{ diff --git a/man/jones.corn.uniformity.Rd b/man/jones.corn.uniformity.Rd index 84ca055c..7f767aa3 100644 --- a/man/jones.corn.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/jones.corn.uniformity.Rd @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ presentation of the data here in order to be more consistent with the figures in the paper. + The electronic supplemental data is in bu/ac, but the paper uses + kg/ha. + Used with permission of Marcus Jones. } \source{ diff --git a/man/kalamkar.potato.uniformity.Rd b/man/kalamkar.potato.uniformity.Rd index a3440770..9855e341 100644 --- a/man/kalamkar.potato.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/kalamkar.potato.uniformity.Rd @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row} \item{\code{col}}{column} - \item{\code{yield}}{yield of potatoes per plot} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield, pounds per plot} } } \details{ @@ -27,8 +27,14 @@ Field length: 96 rows * 3 feet = 288 feet - Units of yield are not given, but might appear in the paper by Kirk - (no access). + Units of yield are not given. In this experiment, there were 22 + plants per plot. Today potato plants yield 3-5 pounds. + If we assume this experiment had a yield of about 2 pound per plant, + that would be 22 pounds per plot, which is similar to the data + values. Also, Kirk 1929 mentions "200 bushels per acre", and 22 pounds + per plot x (43560/66) divided by (60 pounds per bushel) = 242, so this + seems reasonable. Also the `kirk.potato` data by the same author was + recorded in pounds per plot. } \source{ Kalamkar, R.J. (1932). @@ -41,7 +47,9 @@ Field plot technique with potatoes with special reference to the Latin square. Scientific Agriculture, 9, 719. + https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.4141/sa-1929-0067 https://doi.org/10.4141/sa-1929-0067 + https://www.google.com/books/edition/Revue_Agronomique_Canadien/-gMkAQAAMAAJ } \examples{ \dontrun{ diff --git a/man/lehmann.millet.uniformity.Rd b/man/lehmann.millet.uniformity.Rd index 608c7497..9ef82293 100644 --- a/man/lehmann.millet.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/lehmann.millet.uniformity.Rd @@ -26,10 +26,11 @@ The 6th report: Map (only partially scanned in the pdf). - "A part of the dry lands nearest the tank, which is not quite as uniform as the remainder, is already excluded from the experimental ground proper". + "A part of the dry lands nearest the tank, which is not quite as + uniform as the remainder, is already excluded from the experimental ground proper". The 7th report: - P. 12 has grain/straw yield for 1905. + P. 12 (pdf page 233) has grain/straw yield for 1905. The 9th report: P. 1-10 has comments. @@ -52,7 +53,8 @@ https://books.google.com/books?id=u_dHAAAAYAAJ } \references{ - None + Theodor Roemer (1920). + Der Feldversuch. Page 69, table 13. } \examples{ \dontrun{ diff --git a/man/love.cotton.uniformity.Rd b/man/love.cotton.uniformity.Rd index 057e9aa4..3fad5b98 100644 --- a/man/love.cotton.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/love.cotton.uniformity.Rd @@ -13,21 +13,30 @@ \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row} \item{\code{col}}{column} - \item{\code{yield}}{yield} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield, unknown units} } } \details{ Within each 100-foot row, the first 20 feet were harvested as a single plot, and then the rest of the row was harvested in 5-foot lengths. - Crop location is unknown, but likely Southeast Asia given Love's work - teaching in China. Date is likely about 1930-1932 based on the Cornell - reference below. + Field width: 17 plots. First plot is 20 foot segment, the remaining + are 5 foot segments. + + Field length: 10 plots. No distance between the rows is given. + + Crop location not certain. However, Love & Reisner (2012) mentions a + cotton "blank test" of 200 plots at Nanking in 1929-1930. + + Neither document mentions the weight unit. Possibly more information would be in the collected papers of Harry Love at Cornell: https://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/RMA00890.html Cotton - Plot Technic Study 1930-1932. Box 3, Folder 34 + However, this turned out to be a hand-written manuscript by Shiao + a.k.a. Siao, and contained the trial data for + } \source{ @@ -38,7 +47,10 @@ } \references{ - None. + Harry Houser Love & John Henry Reisner (2012). + The Cornell-Nanking Story. + Internet-First University Press. + https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/1813/29080/2/Cornell-Nanking_15Jun12_PROOF.pdf } \examples{ diff --git a/man/masood.rice.uniformity.Rd b/man/masood.rice.uniformity.Rd index 87ba0595..4e7898a5 100644 --- a/man/masood.rice.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/masood.rice.uniformity.Rd @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ results in the American-Eurasian Journal, which seems to be the same paper and seems to refer to the same data. The results may simply differ by a scaling factor. + + The yield values in Masood are labeled as "gm^2" (gram per sq meter), + but this would be extremely low. Probably should be "kgm^2". Field length: 24 plots x 1m = 24m. diff --git a/man/mcclelland.corn.uniformity.Rd b/man/mcclelland.corn.uniformity.Rd index ec208459..981ff526 100644 --- a/man/mcclelland.corn.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/mcclelland.corn.uniformity.Rd @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@ second-to-last row (page 822), the value 1.40 is assumed to be a typographical error and was changed to 14.0 for this data. + The source document does not give the unit of measure for the plot + yields. If the yield was bu/ac, the value of 12 bu/ac would be very + low. On the other hand, a value of 12 pounds per plot * 180 plots per + acre / 56 pounds per bushel = 39 bu/ac would be very reasonable yield + for corn in 1925, whereas 12 kg per plot would be unlikely too high. + Also, in 1925, pound would have been more likely than kilogram. } \source{ diff --git a/man/mercer.mangold.uniformity.Rd b/man/mercer.mangold.uniformity.Rd index aba8a575..d8c377ed 100644 --- a/man/mercer.mangold.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/mercer.mangold.uniformity.Rd @@ -42,7 +42,11 @@ Evidence for conformal invariance of crop yields, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science, 462, 2119--2143. - https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2006.1667 + https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2006.1667 + + Theodor Roemer (1920). + Der Feldversuch. Page 64, table 5. + } \examples{ diff --git a/man/mercer.wheat.uniformity.Rd b/man/mercer.wheat.uniformity.Rd index ebfe249d..b2b0a049 100644 --- a/man/mercer.wheat.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/mercer.wheat.uniformity.Rd @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ Engineering Science}, 462, 2119--2143. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2006.1667 + Theodor Roemer (1920). + Der Feldversuch. Page 65, table 6. + D. G. Rossiter (2014). Tutorial: Using the R Environment for Statistical Computing An example with the Mercer & Hall wheat yield dataset. diff --git a/man/nair.turmeric.uniformity.Rd b/man/nair.turmeric.uniformity.Rd index 550d8b7b..b3006540 100644 --- a/man/nair.turmeric.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/nair.turmeric.uniformity.Rd @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row ordinate} \item{\code{col}}{column ordinate} - \item{\code{yield}}{yield per plot, kg} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield, grams per plot} } } \details{ @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Nair, B. Gopakumaran (1984). Optimum plot size for field experiments on turmeric. Thesis, Kerala Agriculture University. - https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810147397 + http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7829 } \references{ None. diff --git a/man/obsi.potato.uniformity.Rd b/man/obsi.potato.uniformity.Rd index 7dbaaf29..b152a6c5 100644 --- a/man/obsi.potato.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/obsi.potato.uniformity.Rd @@ -59,13 +59,14 @@ library(agridat) data(obsi.potato.uniformity) dat <- obsi.potato.uniformity -# libs(dplyr) -# dat <- group_by(dat, loc) -# summarize(dat, yield=mean(yield)) -## loc yield -## -## 1 L1 2.54 # Obsi says 2.55 -## 2 L2 5.31 # Obsi says 5.36 + # Mean plot yield according to Obsi p. 54 + # libs(dplyr) + # dat <- group_by(dat, loc) + # summarize(dat, yield=mean(yield)) + ## loc yield + ## + ## 1 L1 2.54 # Obsi says 2.55 + ## 2 L2 5.31 # Obsi says 5.36 libs(desplot) desplot(dat, yield ~ col*row, subset=loc=="L1", diff --git a/man/odland.soybean.uniformity.Rd b/man/odland.soybean.uniformity.Rd index 0ea7df0b..7e134ad5 100644 --- a/man/odland.soybean.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/odland.soybean.uniformity.Rd @@ -15,13 +15,25 @@ \describe{ \item{\code{row}}{row} \item{\code{col}}{column} - \item{\code{yield}}{yield: hay in tons, beans in bushels} + \item{\code{yield}}{yield: hay in tons/acre, beans in bushels/acre} } } \details{ Grown at West Virginia Experiment Station in 1925 & 1926. + Soy forage hay: + + In 1925 the crop was harvested for forage, 42 rows, each 200 feet long. + Yields of 8-foot plats recorded to the nearest 0.1 tons. + + Field width: 42 plots * 30 in / 12in/ft = 105 ft + + Field length: 24 plots * 8 feet = 192 feet + border = total 200 feet. + + Note, the hay data in Odland & Garber is measured in 0.1 tons, but has + been converted to tons here. + Soy beans: Soybeans were planted in rows 30 inches apart. @@ -34,21 +46,11 @@ Field length: 28 plots * 8 feet = 224 feet + border = total 232 feet. Odland and Garber provide no agronomic context for the yield variation. - - Soy hay: - - In 1925 the crop was harvested for forage, 42 rows, each 200 feet long. - Yields of 8-foot plats recorded. - - Field width: 42 plots * 30 in / 12in/ft = 105 ft - - Field length: 24 plots * 8 feet = 192 feet + border = total 200 feet. - } \source{ - Odland, TE and Garber, RJ. 1928. + Odland, T.E. and Garber, R.J. (1928). Size of Plat and Number of Replications in Field Experiments with Soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 20, 93--108. diff --git a/man/parker.orange.uniformity.Rd b/man/parker.orange.uniformity.Rd index bffd65ab..9b3dc660 100644 --- a/man/parker.orange.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/parker.orange.uniformity.Rd @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Uniformity trial of oranges } \description{ - Uniformity trial of oranges at Riverside, CA, 1921-1927. + Uniformity trial of oranges at Riverside, CA, 1921-1927. } \usage{data("parker.orange.uniformity")} \format{ @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ Parker et al. state that soil heterogeneity is considerable and first-year yields are not predictive of future yields. - Table 25 has mean top volume per tree for each plot in 1926. Table 26 - has mean area of trunk cross section. + Table 25 has mean top volume per tree for each plot in 1926. + Table 26 has mean area of trunk cross section. } \source{ diff --git a/man/polson.safflower.uniformity.Rd b/man/polson.safflower.uniformity.Rd index a6d45707..42f2b82f 100644 --- a/man/polson.safflower.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/polson.safflower.uniformity.Rd @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ David Polson. 1964. Estimation of Optimum Size, Shape, and Replicate Number of Safflower Plots for Yield Trials. Utah State University, All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, 2979. - Table 6. + Table 6, p. 52. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2979 } diff --git a/man/roemer.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd b/man/roemer.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd index 2abc7150..f362db67 100644 --- a/man/roemer.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/roemer.sugarbeet.uniformity.Rd @@ -19,21 +19,45 @@ } \details{ -Roemer p 27: + Roemer p 27: -Eigene Versuche mit Zuckerrüben, ausgeführt auf dem Neßthaler Zuchtfeld des Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institutes, Bromberg, in den Jahren 1916, 1917 und 1918. 1916 und 1918 war die Versuchsfläche ein und dieselbe, 6,80 a groß und in den beiden Jahren mit Original Klein-Wanzlebener Zuckerrüben auf 30 X 40 cm bebaut. Vorfrucht für 1916 war Hafer, für 1918 Roggen; 1917 war eine andere Fläche, ebenfalls 6,80 a groß, für den Versuch benußt; gesät wurden zwei verschiedene Zuchten von Strube, Schlanstedt. Beide Flächen sind von sehr gleichmäßiger Bodenbeschaffenheit. Bei der Fläche 1916 und 1918 machte sich im ersten Jahre bei den Reihen 31-33 eine geringe Stelle bemerkbar, die 1918 weit weniger in Erscheinung trat. Die Bodenunterschiede sind in allen drei Jahren geringer als die durch die Versuchstechnik bedingten Fehler. + Eigene Versuche mit Zuckerrüben, ausgeführt auf dem Neßthaler + Zuchtfeld des Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institutes, Bromberg, in den Jahren 1916, + 1917 und 1918. 1916 und 1918 war die Versuchsfläche ein und dieselbe, + 6,80 a groß und in den beiden Jahren mit Original Klein-Wanzlebener + Zuckerrüben auf 30 X 40 cm bebaut. Vorfrucht für 1916 war Hafer, für + 1918 Roggen; 1917 war eine andere Fläche, ebenfalls 6,80 a groß, für + den Versuch benußt; gesät wurden zwei verschiedene Zuchten von Strube, + Schlanstedt. Beide Flächen sind von sehr gleichmäßiger + Bodenbeschaffenheit. Bei der Fläche 1916 und 1918 machte sich im + ersten Jahre bei den Reihen 31-33 eine geringe Stelle bemerkbar, die + 1918 weit weniger in Erscheinung trat. Die Bodenunterschiede sind in + allen drei Jahren geringer als die durch die Versuchstechnik bedingten + Fehler. -Translated: Own (Roemer) experiments with sugar beets, carried out on the Neßthal breeding field of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, Bromberg, in the years 1916, 1917 and 1918. In 1916 and 1918 the test area was one and the same, 6.80 are large and with original in both years Klein-Wanzleben sugar beets cultivated on 30 x 40 cm. The previous crop for 1916 was oats, for 1918 it was rye; In 1917 another area, also 6.80 a large, was used for the experiment; Two different varieties from Strube, Schlanstedt were sown. Both areas have very uniform soil conditions. In the 1916 and 1918 area, a small spot was noticeable in rows 31-33 in the first year, which was much less noticeable in 1918. In all three years the soil differences are smaller than the errors caused by the experimental technology. + Translated: Own (Roemer) experiments with sugar beets, carried out on + the Neßthal breeding field of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, Bromberg, + in the years 1916, 1917 and 1918. In 1916 and 1918 the test area was + one and the same, 6.80 are large and with original in both years + Klein-Wanzleben sugar beets cultivated on 30 x 40 cm. The previous + crop for 1916 was oats, for 1918 it was rye; In 1917 another area, + also 6.80 a large, was used for the experiment; Two different + varieties from Strube, Schlanstedt were sown. Both areas have very + uniform soil conditions. In the 1916 and 1918 area, a small spot was + noticeable in rows 31-33 in the first year, which was much less + noticeable in 1918. In all three years the soil differences are + smaller than the errors caused by the experimental technology. -Field width: 2 plots * 17 m = 34 m + Field width: 2 plots * 17 m = 34 m -Field length: 48 plots * 4.17 m = 200 m + Field length: 48 plots * 4.17 m = 200 m -Total area = 34 m * 200 m = 6800 sq m = 6.8 are. - -Cochran says: 96 plots, each 1 row x 55.8 ft (17m). Two sets (years) -1916 and 1918. + Total area = 34 m * 200 m = 6800 sq m = 6.8 are. + + Cochran says: 96 plots, each 1 row x 55.8 ft (17m). + Two sets (years) 1916 and 1918. + Data were typed by K.Wright from Roemer (1920). } \source{ Roemer, T. (1920). diff --git a/man/shafi.tomato.uniformity.Rd b/man/shafi.tomato.uniformity.Rd index a1739766..9baf9638 100644 --- a/man/shafi.tomato.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/shafi.tomato.uniformity.Rd @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Uniformity trial of tomato } \description{ - Uniformity trial of tomato in India. + Uniformity trial of tomato in India } \usage{data("shafi.tomato.uniformity")} \format{ @@ -17,24 +17,27 @@ } } \details{ + The experiment was conducted at the Regional Research Station Faculty + of Agriculture, SKUAST-K Wadura Campus during 2006. + The original data was collected on 1m x 1m plots. The data here are aggregated 2m x 2m plots. Field length: 20 row * 2 m = 40 m Field width: 10 col * 2 m = 20 m + } \source{ Shafi, Sameera (2007). On Some Aspects of Plot Techniques in Field Experiments on Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) in Soils of Kashmir. - Thesis. Univ. of Ag. Sciences & Technology of Kashmir. Table 2.2.1. - https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810083035 + Thesis. Univ. of Ag. Sciences & Technology of Kashmir. Table 2.2.1. https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/assets/pdfjs/web/viewer.html?file=https%3A%2F%2Fkrishikosh.egranth.ac.in%2Fserver%2Fapi%2Fcore%2Fbitstreams%2Ff1473a80-5420-4aba-ae5a-a075539332cd%2Fcontent } \references{ Shafi, Sameera; S.A.Mir, Nageena Nazir, and Anjum Rashid. (2010). Optimum plot size for tomato by using S-PLUS and R-software's in the soils of Kashmir. Asian J. Soil Sci., 4, 311-314. - https://www.researchjournal.co.in/upload/assignments/4_311-314.pdf + http://researchjournal.co.in/upload/assignments/4_311-314.pdf } \examples{ \dontrun{ diff --git a/man/steptoe.morex.pheno.Rd b/man/steptoe.morex.pheno.Rd index 7d20aaeb..cc1fc61b 100644 --- a/man/steptoe.morex.pheno.Rd +++ b/man/steptoe.morex.pheno.Rd @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ libs(qtl) data(steptoe.morex.geno) datg <- steptoe.morex.geno - qtl::plot.map(datg, main="steptoe.morex.pheno") + qtl::plot.map(datg, main="steptoe.morex.geno") qtl::plotMissing(datg) diff --git a/man/vargas.wheat1.Rd b/man/vargas.wheat1.Rd index 060bfaa5..f59f2b25 100644 --- a/man/vargas.wheat1.Rd +++ b/man/vargas.wheat1.Rd @@ -22,21 +22,21 @@ data("vargas.wheat1.traits") \describe{ \item{\code{year}}{year, 1990-1995} \item{\code{MTD}}{Mean daily max temperature December, deg C} - \item{\code{MTJ}}{January} - \item{\code{MTF}}{February} - \item{\code{MTM}}{March} + \item{\code{MTJ}}{Mean max in January} + \item{\code{MTF}}{Mean max in February} + \item{\code{MTM}}{Mean max in March} \item{\code{mTD}}{Mean daily minimum temperature December, deg C} - \item{\code{mTJ}}{January} - \item{\code{mTF}}{February} - \item{\code{mTM}}{March} + \item{\code{mTJ}}{Mean min in January} + \item{\code{mTF}}{Mean min in February} + \item{\code{mTM}}{Mean min in March} \item{\code{PRD}}{Monthly precipitation in December, mm} - \item{\code{PRJ}}{January} - \item{\code{PRF}}{February} - \item{\code{PRM}}{March} - \item{\code{SHD}}{{a numeric vector}} - \item{\code{SHJ}}{January} - \item{\code{SHF}}{February} - \item{\code{SHM}}{March} + \item{\code{PRJ}}{Precipitation in January} + \item{\code{PRF}}{Precipitation in February} + \item{\code{PRM}}{Precipitation in March} + \item{\code{SHD}}{{Sun hours in December}} + \item{\code{SHJ}}{Sun hours in January} + \item{\code{SHF}}{Sun hours in February} + \item{\code{SHM}}{Sun hours in March} } The \code{vargas.wheat1.traits} dataframe has 126 observations on the following 19 variables. @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ data("vargas.wheat1.traits") Mateo Vargas and Jose Crossa and Ken Sayre and Matthew Renolds and Martha E Ramirez and Mike Talbot, 1998. Interpreting Genotype x Environment Interaction in Wheat by - Partial Least Squares Regression, \emph{Crop Science}, 38, 679--689. + Partial Least Squares Regression. + Crop Science, 38, 679-689. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030010x Data provided by Jose Crossa. diff --git a/man/wassom.brome.uniformity.Rd b/man/wassom.brome.uniformity.Rd index 6749046a..17f10096 100644 --- a/man/wassom.brome.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/wassom.brome.uniformity.Rd @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Estimations of Optimum Plot Size Using Data from Bromegrass Uniformity Trials. Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College, Bulletin 396, page 314-319. - https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ag_researchbulletins/32/ + https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/62735 https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112019570701&view=1up&seq=26&skin=2021 } diff --git a/man/wyatt.multi.uniformity.Rd b/man/wyatt.multi.uniformity.Rd index 094f70b5..759effa3 100644 --- a/man/wyatt.multi.uniformity.Rd +++ b/man/wyatt.multi.uniformity.Rd @@ -19,9 +19,13 @@ } } \details{ - Experiments conducted at the Soils Experimental field at the University of Alberta, Canada. - Oats were grown in 1925, The average yield was 88 bushels. - Wheat was grown in 1926, with an average yield of 32.2 bu/acre. + Experiments conducted at the Soils Experimental field at the + University of Alberta, Canada. + + Oats were grown in 1925, with average yield 88 bu/ac. + + Wheat was grown in 1926, with average yield 32.2 bu/ac. + The data reported are relative yields within each year. The plot size in rows 1 and 2 (Series A and B in the original paper) is 1/10th acre.