Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

any suggested or known terms for these metatypes? #562

Open
beaudet opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

any suggested or known terms for these metatypes? #562

beaudet opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
API The issue is about an API or service discuss Discussion of this topic needed model The issue relates to the linked open data model question
Milestone

Comments

@beaudet
Copy link
Collaborator

beaudet commented Feb 5, 2024

Possibly due to limitations in TMS data modeling, we have the following thesaurus reference types that might make good candidates for shareable linked art types if these are even valid classifications.

la:placeActive_term
la:placeBirthed_term
la:placeCollected_term
la:placeDied_term
la:placeExecuted
la:placeProduced
la:placePublished

I think one way to model these as linked art terms would be with AAT:Place_Types sub-classified with active, birth, collection, death, etc. or maybe the inverse of that (active sub-classed as place types?)

e.g.
la:placeActive_term could be defined as:

{
    "id": "https://linked.art/Types/placeActive",
    "type": "Type",
    "_label": "place active",
    "classified_as" : [ {
        "id":"http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300435109",
        "type" : "Type",
        "_label" : "place types",
        "classified_as": [ {
            "id" : "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300393177",
            "type" : "Type",
            "_label" : "active (professional function)"
        }]
    }]
}

which could then be used either as an equivalent for a custom term or directly as a classification term.

I realize some of these should be mapped to more appropriate linked art API endpoints rather than using a classification term, so maybe we shouldn't surface these as classifications at all even if they would exist under the appropriate API endpoint as well as classification terms?

@beaudet beaudet added model The issue relates to the linked open data model API The issue is about an API or service discuss Discussion of this topic needed question labels Feb 5, 2024
@azaroth42 azaroth42 added this to the Questions milestone Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API The issue is about an API or service discuss Discussion of this topic needed model The issue relates to the linked open data model question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants