From dfe5322ce0405ad5708eeb656066197826e1e817 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Sehn Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:00:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] minor changes to text --- explorer.py | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/explorer.py b/explorer.py index 4046ac5..3fc8297 100644 --- a/explorer.py +++ b/explorer.py @@ -548,17 +548,17 @@ def callback(): A better understanding of the democratic governance of intelligence requires more detailed information about an increasingly important group of actors outside the traditional corridors of power: Civic intelligence - oversight practitioners. As part of the GUARD//INT research project, we - conducted online surveys with representatives of civil society - organisations (CSOs) and journalists in France, Germany and the United - Kingdom. + oversight practitioners. As part of the + [GUARD//INT](https://guardint.org) research project, we conducted online + surveys with representatives of civil society organisations (CSOs) and + journalists in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. This site provides open access to the anonymized data we gathered. It visualises - the first empirical investigation of the perceptions of media and CSO - professionals specialised in intelligence and surveillance. The data enables us - to better understand the potential and limitations of civic intelligence - oversight as an increasingly important part of how democratic societies respond - to and oversee digital surveillance. + our empirical investigation of the perceptions of media and CSO + professionals specialised in intelligence and surveillance. The data is + meant to contribute to a better understanding of the potential and + limitations of civic intelligence oversight. We invite you to explore + the data using the sidebar on the left. """ ) @@ -597,16 +597,17 @@ def callback(): st.write("## Understanding the data") st.write( - """The individuals we surveyed mostly engage in civic oversight - practices in their professional capacity and were invited to complete - the survey based on their experience in working on surveillance by - intelligence agencies. We designed two different but overlapping - surveys: One for journalists and one for CSO professionals. When we - posed a question only to journalists, the question code is prepended - with `MS` (media scrutiny). When we put the question only to CSO - professionals, the code is prepended with `CS` (civil society scrutiny). - If the question was put to both groups, the prefix was removed. - """ + """The individuals who participated in the survey mostly engage in + civic oversight practices in their professional capacity. They were + invited to complete the survey based on their experience in working on + surveillance by intelligence agencies. We designed two different but + overlapping surveys: One for journalists and one for CSO professionals. + When we posed a question only to journalists, the question code is + prepended with `MS` (media scrutiny). When we put the question only to + CSO professionals, the code is prepended with `CS` (civil society + scrutiny). If the question was put to both groups, the prefix was + removed. + """ ) st.write( """The questions and response options are structured in different @@ -617,7 +618,7 @@ def callback(): litigation) as well as protections, constraints and attitudes. A comprehensive overview of all questions and answer options can be found in our two codebooks: - """ + """ ) with open("codebooks/guardint_survey_codebook_media.pdf", "rb") as file: st.download_button(