[BUG] no matching manifest for linux/arm/v8 in the manifest list entries

[penggongkui-job]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

docker pull linuxserver/sonarr:arm64v8-develop
it tell me the follow error:
no matching manifest for linux/arm/v8 in the manifest list entries

Expected Behavior

No response

Steps To Reproduce

docker pull linuxserver/sonarr:arm64v8-develop on a 32bit device(my device is coreelec os)

Environment

- OS:
- How docker service was installed:

CPU architecture

arm64

Docker creation

none

Container logs

no matching manifest for linux/arm/v8 in the manifest list entries

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

[Roxedus]

We do not publish arm32 images. If your device is 64bit, you should have a 64bit OS.
https://www.linuxserver.io/blog/end-of-an-arch

[penggongkui-job]

@Roxedus I cannot upgrade to 64bit OS, the coreelec is not support with my device with 64bit os

[penggongkui-job]

I am not need the 32bit images, just arm64/v8 , like the jellyfin/jellyfin docker images:

[penggongkui-job]

CoreELEC:~ # docker version
Client:
Version: 26.0.2
API version: 1.45
Go version: go1.22.2
Git commit: 3c863ff8d3f0b81f25ed3afb60f2822019c4b94f
Built: Wed May 1 02:28:40 UTC 2024
OS/Arch: linux/arm
Context: default

Server:
Engine:
Version: library-import
API version: 1.45 (minimum version 1.24)
Go version: go1.22.2
Git commit: library-import
Built: library-import
OS/Arch: linux/arm
Experimental: false
containerd:
Version: 1.7.15
GitCommit: 926c9586fe4a6236699318391cd44976a98e31f1
runc:
Version: 1.1.12
GitCommit: 51d5e94601ceffbbd85688df1c928ecccbfa4685
docker-init:
Version: 0.19.0
GitCommit:
CoreELEC:~ # uname -a
Linux CoreELEC 4.9.269 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Aug 26 17:08:18 CEST 2024 aarch64 GNU/Linux

this is my system info and docker info

[j0nnymoe]

You can't run those images as your OS clearly states "OS/Arch: linux/arm"

[penggongkui-job]

yeah, i cannot, so is it possible to add back the arm64/v8 image back, i can use that image

[j0nnymoe]

If you look, we have those images. Your issue is your host OS.

[penggongkui-job]

i need a image with variant is v8, just like the jellyfin

docker manifest inspect jellyfin/jellyfin
{
   "schemaVersion": 2,
   "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.list.v2+json",
   "manifests": [
      {
         "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
         "size": 1999,
         "digest": "sha256:040461da121ebe7f5055a385d0f1fc8e8260509041ff0fbce54ec52da2b6bf60",
         "platform": {
            "architecture": "amd64",
            "os": "linux"
         }
      },
      {
         "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
         "size": 2002,
         "digest": "sha256:5820494c52b371ab91cbf4732d1632686bf0b87c7639cdbfcba23a4a443ca45a",
         "platform": {
            "architecture": "arm64",
            "os": "linux",
            "variant": "v8"
         }
      },
      {
         "mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
         "size": 1996,
         "digest": "sha256:8d6a97e97d28298789fc6f997760a2ed5959d4136f61ba13667167fe5d41611b",
         "platform": {
            "architecture": "arm",
            "os": "linux",
            "variant": "v7"
         }
      }
   ]
}

[penggongkui-job]

I think it will not take too much time add this, maybe just docker build with another param?

[thespad]

We know what you need, which is a 32-bit image, and we haven't published 32-bit images in over a year now, as per https://www.linuxserver.io/armhf

For all of the reasons stated there we will not be reintroducing 32-bit images for any of the containers we support.

[penggongkui-job]

You may also have a 64-bit kernel with a 32-bit userspace, especially if you're running an OS like LibreELEC or OSMC, which likely means a 32-bit Docker install. Running getconf LONG_BIT will give you a response of 32 if this is the case.

where should i run this command?

[j0nnymoe]

On the host via CLI/SSH.

[penggongkui-job]

Yes, I am this case, so there is no workaround to use the docker image?

[j0nnymoe]

The work around is to install a 64bit OS.