You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our biologist collaborators hate seeing reversions in trees, and feel that they are a clear signal of a problem in the tree.
@wsdewitt correctly points out that under simple models, reversion mutations are no less likely than any other particular set of mutations. However, they seem like they should be less likely for models that include context sensitivity or selection.
In order to look into this issue I'd like to be able to calculate them on the ensemble of trees in an hDAG and have that be accessible through the gctree interface.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Our biologist collaborators hate seeing reversions in trees, and feel that they are a clear signal of a problem in the tree.
@wsdewitt correctly points out that under simple models, reversion mutations are no less likely than any other particular set of mutations. However, they seem like they should be less likely for models that include context sensitivity or selection.
In order to look into this issue I'd like to be able to calculate them on the ensemble of trees in an hDAG and have that be accessible through the gctree interface.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: