You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Expected behavior
Expected output would be:
[ProcessMitigation][V-77191][medium][WN10-EP-000080]::[WindowsClient]Client
Screenshots
Additional context
I am using the ResourceName and/or InstanceName to determine scan results using PowerStig. For the majority of resources this holds the majority of the information that I need on the fly but for the ProcessMitigation rules, the parsing that I am using would need to be rewritten to support just these rules, and it still would not hold all of the information that I would normally gather.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@mapresto I am updating the resource call to use the standard formatting function. That being said, the rules for V-77091,95,97,101, and 103 have a duplicate key in the resource (MitigationTarget), so they get merged together. I'll need to think on this a little bit.
Describe the bug
ResourceID and InstanceName for ProcessMitigation rules for Windows 10 stig are not in the standard format.
Current output is:
[ProcessMitigation]AcroRd32.exe-V-77191::[WindowsClient]Client
Expected output would be:
[ProcessMitigation][V-77191][medium][WN10-EP-000080]::[WindowsClient]Client
To Reproduce
Create MOF based on Windows 10 composite resource. Assuming the mof file path is save to $testPath run the following:
$TestResults = Test-DSCConfiguration -ComputerName Win10Test -ReferenceConfiguration $testPath
$FullResults = $TestResults.ResourcesInDesiredState + $testResults.ResourcesNotInDesiredState
$fullResults | select ResourceID
Expected behavior
Expected output would be:
[ProcessMitigation][V-77191][medium][WN10-EP-000080]::[WindowsClient]Client
Screenshots
![processmiterror](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26230715/47870866-f1909f80-dde0-11e8-9925-c49adbb70a90.JPG)
Additional context
I am using the ResourceName and/or InstanceName to determine scan results using PowerStig. For the majority of resources this holds the majority of the information that I need on the fly but for the ProcessMitigation rules, the parsing that I am using would need to be rewritten to support just these rules, and it still would not hold all of the information that I would normally gather.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: