Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Task events metrics for scheduler #2100

Open
jpbruinsslot opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Task events metrics for scheduler #2100

jpbruinsslot opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
mula Issues related to the scheduler

Comments

@jpbruinsslot
Copy link
Contributor

** Show the user what resources a specific tool has consumed. This would cover all historical data, but is incidental and does not suffer from scalability issue as much.
** Calculate what a proposed Job is likely to consume based on 'recent similar jobs'. This means that we don't need all the data, just a most recent set. Maybe we can have a daily job that trims this materialized view into a two week or N items window to keep the math required for this calculation reasonable?

  • If we introduce blob fields, lets stick to something postgres has querying tools for, like json/jsonb.

Originally posted by @underdarknl in #1956 (comment)

@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot self-assigned this Dec 7, 2023
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot added the mula Issues related to the scheduler label Dec 7, 2023
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot added this to KAT Dec 11, 2023
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot moved this to Backlog / Refined tasks in KAT Dec 11, 2023
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot moved this from Backlog / Refined tasks to Approved features / Need refinement in KAT Jan 2, 2024
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot moved this from Approved features / Need refinement to Backlog / Refined tasks in KAT Jan 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mula Issues related to the scheduler
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant