Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

In-editor chat window #41

Open
bqv opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

In-editor chat window #41

bqv opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@bqv
Copy link

bqv commented Nov 29, 2024

Problem

Chat requires a browser

Expected behavior

In app interactive buffer or similar, would be nice. Reverse engineering the chat protocol possible?

@bqv bqv added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 29, 2024
@monkoose
Copy link
Owner

So you want to implement it?

@bqv
Copy link
Author

bqv commented Nov 30, 2024

You don't want to?

@LeonardoMor
Copy link
Contributor

While this would be pretty cool, I think it's quite a bit of work.

@monkoose monkoose added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Dec 2, 2024
@monkoose
Copy link
Owner

monkoose commented Dec 2, 2024

I have no plans to do it myself.
For me it is "quite a bit of work" with minified js with shortened variable and function names to understand codeium internals with 0 benefit.

Which limitation browser chat has that can be solved with in-editor chat? Why someone should spend so much time to create it?

@LeonardoMor
Copy link
Contributor

I think it's mostly cosmetic.

If you use Neovim on a remote server through ssh, you might not have a browser.

If you know the port the chat is on, you can make an ssh tunnel to use the remote chat on a local browser.

Beyond that, it's not a problem in my opinion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants