Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More flexible use of metadata templates #36

Open
beanformer opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 9 comments
Open

More flexible use of metadata templates #36

beanformer opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request gitvote

Comments

@beanformer
Copy link
Member

We would like to use the LDH for clinical studies but also basic research projects. The extended metadata templates would not be applicable for these research projects. A more flexible use of metadata templates would be very helpful – can users provide their own metadata templates?

@beanformer beanformer added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 20, 2024
@beanformer
Copy link
Member Author

/vote

Copy link

git-vote bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Configuration file not found. Please see https://github.com/cncf/gitvote#configuration.

@beanformer
Copy link
Member Author

/vote

Again!

Copy link

git-vote bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Vote created

@beanformer has called for a vote on More flexible use of metadata templates (#36).

The following users have binding votes:

User
@beanformer
@fmeineke
@MasoudAbedi
@ReneHaensel

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor Against Abstain
👍 👎 👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 28days. It will pass if at least 50% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

@beanformer
Copy link
Member Author

/check-vote

Copy link

git-vote bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Vote status

So far 25.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor (passing threshold: 50%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
1 0 0 3

Binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
beanformer In favor 2024-03-27 14:39:16.0 +00:00:00
@fmeineke Pending
@MasoudAbedi Pending
@ReneHaensel Pending

@fmeineke
Copy link
Collaborator

Entscheidend ist die vereinfachte Möglichkeit zum Management (Add/Delete/Update) von extended Metadata direkt über LDG Gui - ohne "Kompilations" und ohne nativen Datenbankzugriff. Das ist bereits auf der SEEK Roadmap.

@beanformer
Copy link
Member Author

Entscheidend ist die vereinfachte Möglichkeit zum Management (Add/Delete/Update) von extended Metadata direkt über LDG Gui - ohne "Kompilations" und ohne nativen Datenbankzugriff. Das ist bereits auf der SEEK Roadmap.

Ich wollte nur mal das Voting testen.

Copy link

git-vote bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Vote closed

The vote passed! 🎉

50.00% of the users with binding vote were in favor (passing threshold: 50%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
2 0 0 2

Binding votes (2)

User Vote Timestamp
@beanformer In favor 2024-03-27 14:39:16.0 +00:00:00
@fmeineke In favor 2024-03-27 15:27:38.0 +00:00:00

@git-vote git-vote bot added the gitvote label May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request gitvote
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants