Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Enhanced IDE Integration Support #1486

Open
hongping1963-source opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature Request] Enhanced IDE Integration Support #1486

hongping1963-source opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@hongping1963-source
Copy link

Background

As a developer of ShellSage (a VS Code extension that integrates TheFuck), I've noticed an opportunity to enhance TheFuck's IDE integration capabilities. Currently, while TheFuck works great as a standalone CLI tool, there's room for improvement in supporting IDE-specific integrations.

Current Situation

Currently, when integrating TheFuck with IDEs:

  1. We need to handle the Python environment management manually
  2. The command correction process is optimized for terminal output
  3. There's no built-in API for IDE extensions to interact with TheFuck

Proposal

Add an "IDE Integration Mode" that would:

  1. API Interface

    • Provide a lightweight Python API specifically for IDE integrations
    • Allow direct function calls without shell execution
    • Return structured data (JSON) instead of terminal-formatted text
  2. Performance Optimizations

    • Cache correction rules based on IDE context
    • Provide async correction suggestions
    • Optimize memory usage for long-running IDE sessions
  3. IDE-specific Features

    • Support for IDE-specific command contexts
    • Built-in handling of different terminal types (PowerShell, CMD, bash in IDE)
    • Configuration options specific to IDE environments

Benefits

  1. Easier integration for IDE extension developers
  2. Better performance in IDE environments
  3. More consistent user experience across different IDEs
  4. Reduced implementation overhead for IDE extensions

Implementation Thoughts

  • Add a new module thefuck.ide for IDE-specific functionality
  • Implement an async API interface
  • Add configuration options for IDE-specific behaviors
  • Provide documentation for IDE integration

Questions

  1. Would this align with TheFuck's roadmap?
  2. Are there any concerns about maintaining IDE-specific code?
  3. Would the community be interested in contributing to this feature?

I'm happy to contribute to the implementation if this proposal is of interest to the community.

References

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant