Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

T follicular helper cell logical definition using obsolete term #2967

Open
anitacaron opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

T follicular helper cell logical definition using obsolete term #2967

anitacaron opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@anitacaron
Copy link
Contributor

I was browsing the CL and found out there's an obsolete GO term dangling there. Not surprisingly, this is already an old issue. It might be an easy fix, so I'm bringing it to your attention again.

@dosumis opened this ticket last year about obsolete non-CL terms found in CL by reference check.

I spotted another one by chance, and wonder if there are others:

'T follicular helper cell' Equivalent To 'CD4-positive helper T cell' and ('capable of' some GO_0051024)

Where GO_0051024 is obsolete. In Protege it shows as strikethrough, but in OLS it doesn't, and in Ontobee it's only slightly more evident.

In this case, the obsolete GO term has a replaced_by. Is there a way to trigger the replacement automatically, or at least to flag all instances of external classes that have OBO-compliant obsolete tags? Possibly run as a check with warnings (not errors) before each release?

Tentatively assigning to @matentzn , though I see that this ticket is in the Icebox, and it's certainly not too urgent.

Thanks!

Originally posted by @paolaroncaglia in #607

@addiehl
Copy link
Contributor

addiehl commented Feb 13, 2025

Or just manually replace GO:0051024 with GO:0002639, which would be correct biologically.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants