You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed at the I-Fest, consider adding several FaBIO classes -- which immediately raises strategic decisions about whether FaBIO is enough of an improvement on BIBO that we should consider a merger or replacement. This is a good area for a task force to review publication-related ontology changes and make a recommendation.
One possible resource is a Google Doc at http://goo.gl/NKU1XR and a more detailed comparison of VIVO and BIBO with BIBFRAME and FaBIO at http://goo.gl/2zZx8G
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As discussed at the I-Fest, consider adding several FaBIO classes -- which immediately raises strategic decisions about whether FaBIO is enough of an improvement on BIBO that we should consider a merger or replacement. This is a good area for a task force to review publication-related ontology changes and make a recommendation.
One possible resource is a Google Doc at http://goo.gl/NKU1XR and a more detailed comparison of VIVO and BIBO with BIBFRAME and FaBIO at http://goo.gl/2zZx8G
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: