You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Per discussion from Discord, we will be updating functions within the repository to follow a standard naming scheme for consistency. The new naming scheme for functions in the repository is: [<Module>_]<Imperative><Object>
Some common examples:
// Store the memory address of struct-member `bar` from `foo` in `out`.voidFoo_GetBarPtr(Foo*foo, int*out);
// Return the value of struct-member `bar`.intFoo_GetBar(Foo*foo);
// Return the value of BOOL-typed struct-member `bar`.BOOLFoo_IsBar(Foo*foo);
// Set the value of struct-member `bar` to `in`.voidFoo_SetBar(Foo*foo, intin);
// Loop through the elements of `foo->barArray` and return the first// to match a condition.intFoo_FindFirstBar(Foo*foo);
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Per discussion from Discord, we will be updating functions within the repository to follow a standard naming scheme for consistency. The new naming scheme for functions in the repository is:
[<Module>_]<Imperative><Object>
Some common examples:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: