You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a question that I need to ask you. There are two different sequences, A and B. I need to compare sequence A with sequence B to find the segment on sequence B that has the smallest editing distance from sequence A. If I take the length of sequence A as the window and move one distance on sequence B each time, the following problem will occur.
If the length of the fragments on sequence B is not fixed, for example, if the length distribution is [len (A) -2, len (A)+2], the results will be more accurate, but there will be significant performance loss. I would like to know if you would have a better way to solve this problem. Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For this use case you would probably want to use Smith Waterman. I have plans to add this to rapidfuzz for a while already: rapidfuzz/RapidFuzz#175 however I am not really sure when I will get around to it.
I have a question that I need to ask you. There are two different sequences, A and B. I need to compare sequence A with sequence B to find the segment on sequence B that has the smallest editing distance from sequence A. If I take the length of sequence A as the window and move one distance on sequence B each time, the following problem will occur.
If the length of the fragments on sequence B is not fixed, for example, if the length distribution is [len (A) -2, len (A)+2], the results will be more accurate, but there will be significant performance loss. I would like to know if you would have a better way to solve this problem. Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: