You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to have a bit more insight into the training progress (ETA etc). For a grid search, one can set a verbosity level that is taken into account by sklearn, but sklvq does not provide such a verbose argument.
To serve my needs, I have solved it with a callback class like:
Training progress: 11%|█ | 1115/10001 [00:45<06:01, 24.57it/s]
Perhaps you can consider adding some functionality like this to the LVQBaseClass class such that calling fit(verbose=1) prints this (not sure if it is possible to have multiple callback objects in the solver_params or whether there is a central place that is visited for each run where this code could reside); or alternatively, add the above as an example in the example usages / documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be nice to have a bit more insight into the training progress (ETA etc). For a grid search, one can set a verbosity level that is taken into account by sklearn, but sklvq does not provide such a
verbose
argument.To serve my needs, I have solved it with a callback class like:
This prints e.g.,:
Perhaps you can consider adding some functionality like this to the
LVQBaseClass
class such that callingfit(verbose=1)
prints this (not sure if it is possible to have multiple callback objects in the solver_params or whether there is a central place that is visited for each run where this code could reside); or alternatively, add the above as an example in the example usages / documentation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: