License is not compatible with ORT tool

[yegor256]

When I'm scanning my project using ORT toolkit, it complains:

WARNING: UNMAPPED_DECLARED_LICENSE - Maven:edu.berkeley.cs.jqf:jqf-instrument:2.0 - The declared license 'FreeBSD License' could not be mapped to a valid license or parsed as an SPDX expression. The license was found in package 'Maven:edu.berkeley.cs.jqf:jqf-instrument:2.0'.
WARNING: UNMAPPED_DECLARED_LICENSE - Maven:edu.berkeley.cs.jqf:jqf-fuzz:2.0 - The declared license 'FreeBSD License' could not be mapped to a valid license or parsed as an SPDX expression. The license was found in package 'Maven:edu.berkeley.cs.jqf:jqf-fuzz:2.0'.
ERROR: NO_LICENSE_IN_DEPENDENCY - Maven:edu.berkeley.cs.jqf:jqf-instrument:2.0 - No license information is available for dependency 'Maven:edu.berkeley.cs.jqf:jqf-instrument:2.0'.
ERROR: NO_LICENSE_IN_DEPENDENCY - Maven:edu.berkeley.cs.jqf:jqf-fuzz:2.0 - No license information is available for dependency 'Maven:edu.berkeley.cs.jqf:jqf-fuzz:2.0'.

Maybe in JQF we can replace FreeBSD License text in the pom.xml with something SPDX compatible, see https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2-draft/SPDX-license-expressions/

[sschuberth]

More specifically, you should generally use an SPDX license identifier from this list.

[rohanpadhye]

Thanks, I realize the naming was sloppy earlier (and funnily nobody ever complained before, even though I know of several big-tech orgs using JQF internally). The fix is in #267 is good. I also need to do a more general pass to ensure consistency of copyright holder names, etc. which I'll do before making a 2.1 release.