You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The existing client/server examples would be perfect for this, except that the CMakeLists.txt they use unconditionally build librustls from scratch using cargo-c pointed to output into the cmake build root.
It would be better if we generalized this so that if an existing librustls was available (e.g. from being discovered via pkg-config) the build would prefer to use that copy of the lib instead of building it anew. This would let us use the test binaries with the pre-built artifacts during the testing phase of the binary artifact release CI process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As a follow-up to #506 it would be nice to remove the need for the 3rd party https://github.com/cpu/rustls-ffi-test repo for smoke-testing built artifacts.
The existing client/server examples would be perfect for this, except that the
CMakeLists.txt
they use unconditionally buildlibrustls
from scratch usingcargo-c
pointed to output into the cmake build root.It would be better if we generalized this so that if an existing
librustls
was available (e.g. from being discovered viapkg-config
) the build would prefer to use that copy of the lib instead of building it anew. This would let us use the test binaries with the pre-built artifacts during the testing phase of the binary artifact release CI process.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: