-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathtrial
180 lines (125 loc) · 8.36 KB
/
trial
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
To solve this problem using R language, we will follow the steps outlined in the questions. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to approach this problem:
### Step 1: Import the Data
Assuming the data is in a CSV file named `tooth_growth.csv`, you can import it using the `read.csv()` function.
```R
tooth_growth <- read.csv("tooth_growth.csv")
```
### Step 2: Check and Organize the Data
Check the structure of the data and ensure that the columns are correctly named and formatted.
```R
str(tooth_growth)
```
If necessary, reformat the columns. For example, if the dose is in a character format, you may want to convert it to a numeric format.
```R
tooth_growth$dose <- as.numeric(as.character(tooth_growth$dose))
```
### Step 3: Plot the Data
A useful plot for this data could be a boxplot or a bar plot to visualize the distribution of tooth length across different treatments.
```R
library(ggplot2)
# Boxplot
ggplot(tooth_growth, aes(x = supp, y = len, fill = supp)) +
geom_boxplot() +
labs(title = "Tooth Length by Vitamin C Supplement")
# Bar plot
ggplot(tooth_growth, aes(x = supp, y = len, fill = dose)) +
geom_bar(stat = "summary", fun = "mean") +
labs(title = "Average Tooth Length by Vitamin C Supplement and Dose")
```
### Step 4: Statistical Hypotheses
To test whether the vitamin C formula is useful, we can set up the following hypotheses:
- Null hypothesis (H0): There is no difference in tooth length between the vitamin C formula and fresh orange juice.
- Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a difference in tooth length between the vitamin C formula and fresh orange juice.
### Step 5: Carry Out an Appropriate Test
We can use a two-way ANOVA to test the effect of the supplement type and dose on tooth length.
```R
# Two-way ANOVA
aov_result <- aov(len ~ supp * dose, data = tooth_growth)
summary(aov_result)
```
### Step 6: Present and Discuss Results
Based on the ANOVA results, you can determine if there is a significant effect of the supplement type, dose, or their interaction on tooth length. Discuss whether the p-values indicate a significant difference.
### Step 7: Suggest Next Steps
If the results suggest that the vitamin C formula is effective, you might suggest further studies with a larger sample size or different dosages. If the results are inconclusive, you might suggest additional experiments or a different experimental design.
Remember to check the assumptions of ANOVA (normality, homogeneity of variances, independence) before interpreting the results. You can use diagnostic plots like QQ-plots and tests like Levene's test for homogeneity of variances.
This is a general guide, and the actual code might need to be adjusted based on the specific structure and content of the `tooth_growth.csv` file.
To address the problem using R language, follow these steps:
### Step 1: Import the Data
Assuming the genotyping data is in a CSV file named `genotype.csv`, you can import it using the `read.csv()` function.
```R
genotype_data <- read.csv("genotype.csv")
```
### Step 2: Organize the Data
Check the structure of the data and ensure that the columns are correctly named and formatted.
```R
str(genotype_data)
```
If necessary, convert the date to a Date object for easier manipulation.
```R
genotype_data$BD <- as.Date(genotype_data$BD)
```
### Step 3: Describe the Data
Summarize the data to understand the distribution of genotypes, sex, and any other relevant information.
```R
summary(genotype_data)
table(genotype_data$genotype)
```
### Step 4: Mendelian Inheritance Expectation
Under Mendelian inheritance, if we cross heterozygous mice (Gene_XWT/mut), we expect the following genotype ratios in the offspring:
- Gene_XWT/WT: 1/4
- Gene_XWT/mut: 1/2
- Gene_Xmut/mut: 1/4
### Step 5: Choose the Appropriate Statistical Test
To test whether the mutation affects the survival of mice, we can use a Chi-squared test for goodness of fit to compare the observed genotype frequencies with the expected Mendelian ratios.
### Step 6: State the Statistical Hypotheses
- Null hypothesis (H0): The observed genotype frequencies follow Mendelian inheritance ratios.
- Alternative hypothesis (H1): The observed genotype frequencies do not follow Mendelian inheritance ratios.
### Step 7: Carry Out the Test
Perform the Chi-squared test to compare the observed and expected genotype frequencies.
```R
# Calculate expected frequencies based on Mendelian inheritance
expected_counts <- c(1/4, 1/2, 1/4) * nrow(genotype_data)
# Perform Chi-squared test
chisq.test(table(genotype_data$genotype), p = expected_counts)
```
### Step 8: Present and Discuss Results
Interpret the Chi-squared test results, including the p-value. If the p-value is less than a significance level (commonly 0.05), you reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the mutation may affect the survival or the genotyping process.
### Step 9: Suggest Next Steps
Based on the results, you might suggest:
- Further investigation into why the observed genotype frequencies differ from Mendelian expectations.
- Additional genotyping to confirm the results.
- Studying the phenotypes associated with the different genotypes to understand the mutation's effects.
- Longitudinal studies to observe the survival rates and health outcomes of mice with different genotypes.
Remember to consider other factors that might affect survival, such as environmental conditions or maternal effects, and control for these in your analysis if possible. Also, ensure that the assumptions of the Chi-squared test are met before interpreting the results.
### Suitable Statistical Test
For this data, a suitable statistical test would be a Chi-squared test for independence. This test is appropriate because:
1. The data are categorical (satisfaction with opening times is either 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied').
2. The data represent counts (number of button presses for each category).
3. The goal is to determine if there is a significant association between the opening times (two levels: 6am-5pm and 10am-9pm) and customer satisfaction (two levels: 'satisfied' and 'unsatisfied').
### Null and Alternative Hypotheses
- **Null Hypothesis (H0)**: There is no association between the opening times and customer satisfaction. In other words, the preference for opening times does not affect the level of satisfaction among customers.
- **Alternative Hypothesis (H1)**: There is an association between the opening times and customer satisfaction. This means that changing the opening times does have an impact on the level of satisfaction among customers.
### Analysis
To perform the Chi-squared test, we can set up a contingency table with the observed frequencies:
| Opening Times / Satisfaction | Satisfied | Unsatisfied |
|-------------------------------|-----------|-------------|
| 6am-5pm | 864 | 714 |
| 10am-9pm | 980 | 473 |
The expected frequencies under the null hypothesis can be calculated using the formula:
\[ E_{ij} = \frac{(\text{Row Total}_i \times \text{Column Total}_j)}{\text{Grand Total}} \]
Where \( E_{ij} \) is the expected frequency for the cell in the ith row and jth column.
### R Code for Chi-squared Test
Here's how you could perform the Chi-squared test in R:
```R
# Create a contingency table
observed <- matrix(c(864, 714, 980, 473), nrow = 2, byrow = TRUE,
dimnames = list(c("6am-5pm", "10am-9pm"), c("Satisfied", "Unsatisfied")))
# Perform Chi-squared test
chisq.test(observed)
```
### Interpretation of Results
The Chi-squared test will provide a p-value. If the p-value is less than the significance level (commonly 0.05), you would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant association between the opening times and customer satisfaction.
### Conclusion
Based on the Chi-squared test results, if the p-value is significant, it would suggest that students are more satisfied with one of the opening times compared to the other. You would then look at the observed counts to determine which opening time received more 'satisfied' responses.
### Suggestion for Next Steps
If the results indicate that the later opening times (10am-9pm) are associated with higher satisfaction, the coffee shop owners might consider adopting these hours permanently or further investigate the preferences of different customer segments. If the results are not significant, they could continue to gather data or conduct additional surveys to better understand customer preferences.