Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The same search results for different jobs #3

Open
spyker77 opened this issue Sep 23, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

The same search results for different jobs #3

spyker77 opened this issue Sep 23, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@spyker77
Copy link
Owner

Currently, there are the same search results for c# developer and c++ developer noticed. There is also a chance for more issues of the same type. Possible reasons:

  1. Settings for a full text search in PostgreSQL (index on vacancy title).
  2. Sanitizing of the user input before the following search.
  3. Pattern for parsing the particular titles (unidentified by job sites - sources).
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2020
@spyker77
Improve the code style according to codacy #3
b42b67e
@spyker77 spyker77 added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 7, 2021
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@spyker77
Changed script in travis.yml #3
a05a1eb
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@spyker77
Changed travis.yml to resolve problem with unsupported version #3
5ec4793
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@spyker77
Changed travis.yml trying to resolve 137 error, #3
6d3794d
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@spyker77
Changed travis.yml trying to resolve 137 error, #3
ce1ccd8
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@spyker77
Changed travis.yml to fix missing DJANGO_SECRET_KEY inside env, #3
e60baa8
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@spyker77
Changed travis.yml to fix missing DJANGO_SECRET_KEY inside env, #3
0f80ab6
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@spyker77
Improve the code style according to codacy #3
52205c4
spyker77 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@spyker77
Improve the code style according to codacy #3
23c955c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@spyker77