New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

We should accept the syntax “t1 JOIN t2 ON …” just as we do the cross-join + fkey-pkey condition for the NLP feedback generation. #10

Open

wholton opened this issue Oct 23, 2014 · 1 comment

Labels

Collaborator

wholton commented Oct 23, 2014

Should we convert before the rules fire or change/add a new join rule?

wholton added bug enhancement and removed bug labels

wholton changed the title We should accept the syntax “t1 JOIN t2 ON …” just as we do the cross-join + fkey-pkey condition for the NLP feedback generation. Should we convert before the rules fire or change/add a new join rule? We should accept the syntax “t1 JOIN t2 ON …” just as we do the cross-join + fkey-pkey condition for the NLP feedback generation.

Collaborator

jakecobb commented Oct 23, 2014

The rule should match this case, otherwise it has a bug.

jakecobb added bug nlp and removed enhancement labels

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment