You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Tracking issue developed off of the comments in #272:
on the calendar itself
some of the other views are what I would call "low in design quality", since there is no corresponding mockup. the agenda view is particularly bad.
similarly, mobile view is subpar
there are contrast issues with the white text on the gradient
in general, I don't think this calendar is very accessible, though I haven't had much time to test.
on the event structure
currently there is no particular support for virtual/in-person events, or highlighting things like zoom links, feedback forms, or resources. we didn't have this in the design, but might be good to do!
link support is hard-coded; there is no support for Zoom, IG, Itch, Discord, Google Forms, GitHub, etc.
no support for all-day events
the generated description does not apply link effects or any markdown-esque styling
currently, there is no mechanism to merge the output of the script with the existing input; this is going to be a headache down the line
id offset is hard-coded
little field validation is done
the recurring week range requires a slightly different column format than what we have now - 2021-10-04 - 2021-12-01 instead of relying on the quarter system
lots of things are hard-coded, so we'll need to keep an eye out for minor human errors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Tracking issue developed off of the comments in #272:
event.js
#281)offset
is hard-coded2021-10-04 - 2021-12-01
instead of relying on the quarter systemThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: