Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add-ons containg Java code should be packaged as AMPs #81

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Feb 14, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Add-ons containg Java code should be packaged as AMPs #81

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Feb 14, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

As discussed in issue 77, JAR files are easily installed into shared/lib but 
this does not work for add-ons containing Java classes.

A better alternative would be to build an AMP file containing the JAR, so it 
can be more easily deployed into WEB-INF/lib.

Ideally the JAR containing the Java code would be separate from the JAR 
containing the config. Web-tier stuff should also be separated out into a 
different project from the repo stuff.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by will.abson on 27 Jun 2012 at 2:11

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant