You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm guessing we just universally exclude watch expressions, but we should include them if a regular expression depends on them, or complain and fail when we try to add a dependent; but why not just include them?
We hope that nobody is referring to named watches in their other definitions, but as an error message, an unformatted sqlite exception is p. bad. The problem is likely that we unconditionally exclude watch expressions when adding, even if they are dependencies.
Mitchell says maybe stop supporting named regular watches at all.
Chris wonders if it wouldn't be the same amount of work to fix the exclusion vs disallowing named regular watches.
test> named = []
x = named
followed by add produces the same-looking sort of crash
Referring to a named watch, then adding, triggers sqlite crash
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: