You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I propose that a tag be added to indicate subparagraph division.
In some formats, like web pages, good style requires very frequent paragraph breaks in order to avoid a wall of text. (This is a very common web site design guideline.) On the other hand, in a print format, an excessive number of paragraph breaks would make the printed version of a book very long.
If there were a subparagraph marker, the publisher could decide how to interpret it—and might choose to interpret it differently for different publication media. For instance, on a computer screen they could format them as full paragraph breaks since space is not an issue. Or in a printed text they could ignore them altogether to save space. (Or any other way: the Nestle-Aland typesets subparagraph breaks with a large horizontal space, for instance.)
The regular \p tag would be maintained for (full) paragraph breaks.
I envision an empty tag like \subp for USFM or a self-closing tag like <subb/> in USX. I don't there would be a need to create additional hierarchical structure in USX files.
I'm aware that I could use a custom tag, but if it becomes an official USFM tag, then people who write the publishing software would make an effort to implement it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The semantics is different, though. My idea is for an optional paragraph-level break, rather than just specifying where a line break can occur. In the example in the docs, for instance, it would never be appropriate for “Jesus Heals a Man // Who Could Not Walk” to be typeset as two different paragraphs.
I propose that a tag be added to indicate subparagraph division.
In some formats, like web pages, good style requires very frequent paragraph breaks in order to avoid a wall of text. (This is a very common web site design guideline.) On the other hand, in a print format, an excessive number of paragraph breaks would make the printed version of a book very long.
If there were a subparagraph marker, the publisher could decide how to interpret it—and might choose to interpret it differently for different publication media. For instance, on a computer screen they could format them as full paragraph breaks since space is not an issue. Or in a printed text they could ignore them altogether to save space. (Or any other way: the Nestle-Aland typesets subparagraph breaks with a large horizontal space, for instance.)
The regular
\p
tag would be maintained for (full) paragraph breaks.I envision an empty tag like
\subp
for USFM or a self-closing tag like<subb/>
in USX. I don't there would be a need to create additional hierarchical structure in USX files.I'm aware that I could use a custom tag, but if it becomes an official USFM tag, then people who write the publishing software would make an effort to implement it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: