Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add centralized plotting function for DSM/DTM comparison #33

Open
Jack-Hayes opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Add centralized plotting function for DSM/DTM comparison #33

Jack-Hayes opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@Jack-Hayes
Copy link
Member

Jack-Hayes commented Dec 12, 2024

Based on efforts for making figures for AGU 2024, we want to make a centralized plotting function to compare cascading datasets' elevations and their differences.

See old archive repo for workflow for plotting histograms of differences over different LULC classes which was adapted from the already-existing sliderule example. Also see archive repo for messy, incomplete difference map plotting. @ShashankBice has an updated notebook for plotting these difference maps.

Ideally we will have:
Standard set of 4 (10x7.5") figs total:

  1. DSM settings and lidar DSM using only coincident data (standard format, 3 rows, like Shashank’s figure plus histograms)
  2. Similar to 1, but with DTM results
  3. DSM settings and lidar DSM using all available data, discussed in this thread
  4. Similar to 3, but with DTM results

@dshean can confirm, but I believe this will be separate of to-be-implemented LiDAR and stereo DTM/DSM processing funcs. So the plotting function(s) will assume already-defined DSM/DTM variables?

@Jack-Hayes Jack-Hayes added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 12, 2024
@scottyhq scottyhq moved this to Todo in Coincident v1.0 Jan 3, 2025
@scottyhq scottyhq added this to the v0.2 milestone Jan 3, 2025
@Jack-Hayes Jack-Hayes moved this from Todo to In Progress in Coincident v1.0 Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants