You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based on efforts for making figures for AGU 2024, we want to make a centralized plotting function to compare cascading datasets' elevations and their differences.
Ideally we will have:
Standard set of 4 (10x7.5") figs total:
DSM settings and lidar DSM using only coincident data (standard format, 3 rows, like Shashank’s figure plus histograms)
Similar to 1, but with DTM results
DSM settings and lidar DSM using all available data, discussed in this thread
Similar to 3, but with DTM results
@dshean can confirm, but I believe this will be separate of to-be-implemented LiDAR and stereo DTM/DSM processing funcs. So the plotting function(s) will assume already-defined DSM/DTM variables?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Based on efforts for making figures for AGU 2024, we want to make a centralized plotting function to compare cascading datasets' elevations and their differences.
See old archive repo for workflow for plotting histograms of differences over different LULC classes which was adapted from the already-existing sliderule example. Also see archive repo for messy, incomplete difference map plotting. @ShashankBice has an updated notebook for plotting these difference maps.
Ideally we will have:
Standard set of 4 (10x7.5") figs total:
@dshean can confirm, but I believe this will be separate of to-be-implemented LiDAR and stereo DTM/DSM processing funcs. So the plotting function(s) will assume already-defined DSM/DTM variables?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: