Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GEDI Search Filtering #43

Open
Jack-Hayes opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

GEDI Search Filtering #43

Jack-Hayes opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@Jack-Hayes
Copy link
Member

Which flags to use and how to filter data for GEDI - we can’t just use the default sliderule settings. There is likely a slope-dependent bias for GEDI points as well as landcover class dependence.

How/can we do this dynamically in an efficient manner?

@Jack-Hayes Jack-Hayes added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jan 3, 2025
@Jack-Hayes Jack-Hayes moved this to Todo in Coincident v1.0 Jan 3, 2025
@scottyhq
Copy link
Member

scottyhq commented Jan 3, 2025

Currently we only set the following flags

params.update(
{
"degrade_filter": True,
"l2_quality_filter": True,
}
)

xref: https://github.com/orgs/SlideRuleEarth/discussions/442

And the existing example notebook https://coincident.readthedocs.io/en/latest/examples/sliderule.html uses both the elevation_lm and _hr without explaining the differences

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants