-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nsxt_policy_group member_type policy evolve #1266
Comments
Thanks @llebotlan, indeed we should remove this validation as NSX allows combinations now |
Adding this issue to the 3.7.0 milestone after discussing it with @annakhm |
Moving this issue to 3.8.0 due to release timeline constraints. |
Hi @salv-orlando , also following this issue as well, what's the 3.8.0 release timeline ? For the context, need this for the following: `
} |
@gorkemozlu release timeline is available here |
Hi team @salv-orlando @ksamoray , it looks like tomorrow is the release day for 3.8.0, just checking in for this issue, we still need this :) |
@gorkemozlu Unfortunately we need to move this to the v3.9.0 as we're close to the 3.8.0 release (which will be moved by a week in any case). This is a relatively complex use case to address with NSX groups. We will keep it however in our priority list for v3.9.0. |
Describe the bug
Today, I have Version 4.1.1.0.0.22224312 NSXT which one can filter nsxt_policy_group member_type SegmentPort and Segment. But I tried from terraform :
criteria {
condition {
member_type = "SegmentPort" <====
key = "Tag"
operator = "EQUALS"
value = "vsphere_port|${var.ports[0]}"
}
condition {
member_type = "Segment" <====
key = "Tag"
operator = "EQUALS"
value = "*{var.nsx_tag}|${var.net}"
}
}
I can do this
Reproduction steps
Error: Nested conditions must all use the same member_type, but found 'Segment' with 'SegmentPort'
│
│ with nsxt_policy_group.networkTag["monitoring_support"],
│ on 3-nsx.tf line 366, in resource "nsxt_policy_group" "networkTag":
│ 366: resource "nsxt_policy_group" "networkTag" {
...
Expected behavior
Maybe let NSX API reply for you despite of avoiding unsupported configuration
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: