Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Example 157 is not valid JSON #448

Open
2 of 5 tasks
sebilasse opened this issue Jan 23, 2018 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #587
Open
2 of 5 tasks

Example 157 is not valid JSON #448

sebilasse opened this issue Jan 23, 2018 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #587
Labels
Needs Group Input/Decision

Comments

@sebilasse
Copy link

Please Indicate One:

  • Editorial
  • Question
  • Feedback
  • Blocking Issue
  • Non-Blocking Issue

Please Describe the Issue:

Example 157 is not a valid JSON due to line breaks [multiple lines in "content"].
in https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#microsyntaxes
gobengo pushed a commit to gobengo/activitystreams that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2018
Fix invalid JSON in example 156
4e09522 
Fix w3c#448
@gobengo gobengo mentioned this issue Jan 24, 2018
Closed
@evanp evanp linked a pull request Feb 28, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
@evanp
Copy link
Collaborator

evanp commented Feb 28, 2024

Example 157 has a JSON error since a string wraps across multiple lines. I added an erratum to show the full string on a single line.

There may be a way to improve the readability of this example by using softwrap in reSpec to do this correctly when we merge into the editor's draft. Example and explanation here:

w3c/vc-data-model#1443 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Needs Group Input/Decision
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add erratum for example 157 w3c/activitystreams
2 participants
@evanp @sebilasse