From c1285de3614fc044e1686ae420e9792b5683dabb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Rivoal Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:40:49 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] phrasing improvement Co-authored-by: Nigel Megitt --- index.bs | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/index.bs b/index.bs index e6f80d49..f1d97406 100644 --- a/index.bs +++ b/index.bs @@ -2702,11 +2702,12 @@ Determining the W3C Decision those other conditions must also be re-fulfilled.
- For example, to make [=substantive changes=] to a [=technical report=] - prior to publication as a [=Recommendation=], - it would need to go through a new [=Update Request=], + For example, if [=substantive changes=] to a [=technical report=] + are requested when assessing the transition from + [=Candidate Recommendation=] to [=Recommendation=], + the technical report would need to go through a new [=Update Request=], be republished as a new [=Candidate Recommendation=], - and fulfill the criteria for advancement. + and that new version would need to fulfill the criteria for advancement. Alternatively, the desired changes can be introduced as non-substantive amendments using the process for [[#revising-rec|revising a Recommendation]]. However, they cannot be directly integrated between [=CRS=] and [=REC=],