-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Editor's guide
- We use ReSpec as the format for all documents, and locate them in the /spec directory of each repository, along with related files (images, grammars, etc.)
Include the following scripts:
<script src="https://www.w3.org/Tools/respec/respec-w3c" class="remove"></script>
<script src="./common/local-biblio.js" class="remove"></script>
<script src="./common/fixup.js" class="remove"></script>
Do not defer loading of respecc-w3c, as fixup.js
needs access to some of the things it loads.
Common files are contained in the rdf-common repository and should be copied to /spec/common directory. There is a step in a GitHub Action that can check to verify that these files are consistent.
Generally, common/local-biblio.js
should contain common bibliographic references. if they are widely used, they can be added permanently to specRef.
Entries are in local-biblio for the 1.2 specs, but shouldn't be necessary after FPWD, when they'll automatically be added to specRef.
common/fixup.js
includes an end-all
event to correct entries such as <a data-cite="RDF12-CONCEPTS#triple">...</a>
such that, when used in a document with the same short-name, it will un-anchor it and add (this document)
. Used for localizing common/related.html
.
- Add
localBiblio: localBibliograph
, which is defined incommon/local-biblio.js
. - Remember that
edDraftURI
should end in/spec/
, so that referencing the editors draft doesn't take you to the repository, but to the rendered draft. -
previosPublishDate
,previousMaturity
, andprefRecShortname
should be set up for the 1.1 recommendations. - Use
formerEditors
to recognize previous editors.
We might consider creating a common CSS file to help maintain consistency between the different specs.
The sotd
section (which automatically gets a heading) should have something that includes common/related.html
using data-include
. We need to decide if each document should list all related RDF and SPARQL documents, or we create subsets for RDF and SPARQL.
- Define terms using
<dfn>
, which can take some modifiers. Note thatdata-lt
can be used to define aliases for that term, but also affects which is actually exported from the spec. (see the "index" section). Useclass="export"
orclass="noexport"
to control its visibility. - If changing a previous definition (e.g., because it was errantly exported as plural, or duplicately defined), add a span element with an
id
attribute so that any dangling references go someplace. For example:<dfn data-lt="inconsistent">Inconsistency</dfn><span id="dfn-inconsistency"><!-- obsolete term --></span>
.
ReSpec provides a number of different ways to reference definitions from different documents.
- Bare anchors will automatically be filled in if there is a match with a local (or cross-referenced) definition. E.g.,
<a>triple</a>
would be styled and updated to<a href="#dfn-triple">triple</a>
. - Anchors can use
data-cite
to explicitly get a term (or other fragment) from another document, which has the added attribute of adding a citation to that document. E.g.,<a data-cite="RDF12-CONCEPTS#dfn-triple">triple</a>
. (Note that they've marked this as obsolete, and there's a guide for xref, but I've resisted doing this). - Normal
[[]]
references can add citations (e.g.,[[RDF12-CONCEPTS]]
), and the form with three brackets[[[RDF12-CONCEPTS]]]
will expand the document name.
Use either <pre class="example">
or <aside class="example">
for example blocks. Examples can have titles, and we should consider a policy on using this.
Blocks within an example do not need to be left justified, as ReSpec does this automatically now.
Consider using data-transform="updateExample"
with <!-- .. -->
comments to avoid entity escapes. This also allows for adding comments (####
) and highlighting (****
) for those examples with some CSS styling. See common/fixup.js
. Automatic example highllighting may mess this up, in which case class="nohiglight"
may be necessary.
<pre class="example nquads" data-transform="updateExample">
<!--
<http://one.example/subject1> <http://one.example/predicate1> <http://one.example/object1> <http://example.org/graph3> . # comments here
# or on a line by themselves
_:subject1 <http://an.example/predicate1> "object1" <http://example.org/graph1> .
_:subject2 <http://an.example/predicate2> "object2" <http://example.org/graph5> .
-->
</pre>
Direct contributors to the specification can be classified as editors
, formerEditors
, or authors
.
Entries can use fields from a Person
entry.
All editors MUST have a w3cid field, other uses may include it as well.
The use of url
field for personal URLs discouraged.
Consider using the note
field to describe a particular type of contribution (e.g., "Chair", "Contributor", etc.)
Respec has special treatment for an element with id
gh-contributors
, which is automatically loaded and formatted with the names of people committing to the repository (excluding editors). For example:
<section id="section-Acknowledgments" class="informative appendix">
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<p>The following people have contributed to this specification:
<span id="gh-contributors"></span>
</p>
<p>In addition to the <a href="https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/rdf-star/participants">members of the RDF-star Working Group</a>.</p>
</section>
- Include a definition index to show all locally defined and imported definitions.
- Include an issue summary to show issues from the repo.
- Use
data-number
to reference a specific issue. - Consider hiding details in
<details>
.
Summary of the RDF-star WG wiki.
- Editor's guide
- Meeting minutes
- RDF terminology
- Scribes
- Use Cases collection
- RDF-star syntax and semantics:
- RDF-star "alternative baseline" (VOTED 2024.11.14 - frozen)
- RDF-star "liberal baseline" (current working version)
- RDF-star "minimal baseline" (VOTED 2024.07.18 - frozen - superseded by vote 2024.11.14 - deprecated)
- RDF-star "working baseline" (working version - deprecated)
- RDF‐star baseline examples
- RDF-star and LPGs
- Extending the baseline with "asserted" stuff
- systems and acronyms
- Task forces
- Text Direction considerations
- Text Direction Proposal
- Triple‐Edge-subgroup-proposals