-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
RDF star "baseline"
graph ::= triple*
triple ::= subject predicate object
subject ::= NoLiteralTerm
predicate ::= iri
object ::= term
NoLiteralAtomicTerm ::= iri | BlankNode
atomicTerm ::= NoLiteralAtomicTerm | literal
NoLiteralTerm ::= NoLiteralAtomicTerm | tripleTerm
term ::= NoLiteralTerm | literal
tripleTerm ::= transparentTripleTerm | opaqueTripleTerm
transparentTripleTerm ::= triple
opaqueTripleTerm ::= triple
- RDF 1.1 syntax is the above without the tripleTerm category and its dependents.
- A term is denoted by
r
, a triple byt
, and a graph byg
. - Given a triple
t
, we denote the subject, predicate, object oft
ast.s
,t.p
,t.o
, respectively.
An RDF simple interpretation I
is a structure <IR
, IP
, IS
, IL
, IEXT
, RE
, SRE
> consisting of:
- A non-empty set
IR
of resources, called the domain or universe ofI
. - A set
IP
, called the set of properties ofI
. - A mapping
IS
from IRIs intoIR ⋃ IP
, called the interpretation of IRIs. - A partial mapping
IL
from literal intoIR
, called the interpretation of literals. - A mapping
IEXT
fromIP
into2
IR x IR
, called the extension of properties. - ⏩ An injective function
RE
fromIR x IP x IR
intoIR
, called the denotation of transparent triple terms. ⏪ - ⏩ An injective function
SRE
from opaqueTripleTerm into literal, called the syntactic denotation of opaque triple terms. ⏪
A
is a mapping from BlankNode to IR
.
Given I
and A
, the function [I+A](.)
is defined over terms, triples, and graphs as follows.
-
[I+A](r) = IS(r)
ifr
is a iri -
[I+A](r) = IL(r)
ifr
is a literal - ⏩
[I+A](r) = RE([I+A](r.s), [I+A](r.p), [I+A](r.o))
ifr
is a transparentTripleTerm ⏪️ - ⏩
[I+A](r) = IL(SRE(r))
ifr
is a opaqueTripleTerm ⏪️ -
[I+A](r) = A(r)
ifr
is a BlankNode
-
[I+A](t) = TRUE
if and only if<[I+A](t.s), [I+A](t.o)> ∈ IEXT([I+A](t.p))
-
[I+A](g) = TRUE
if and only if∀ t ∈ g . [I+A](t) = TRUE
A simple interpretation I
is a model of a graph g
if and only if ∃ A . [I+A](g) = TRUE
.
The set of all models of a graph g
is called models(g)
.
Simple entailment: g ⊨ g'
if and only if models(g) ⊆ models(g')
.
- RDF 1.1 simple semantics is the above without the parts within ⏩...⏪ marks.
graph ::= triple*
triple ::= ( subject predicate object ) |
( reifier rdf:reifies transparentTripleTerm ) |
( annotation rdf:isAnnotationOf opaqueTripleTerm )
subject ::= noLiteralAtomicTerm
predicate ::= iri_but_rdf:reifies_or_rdf:isAnnotationOf
object ::= atomicTerm
noLiteralAtomicTerm ::= iri | BlankNode
atomicTerm ::= noLiteralAtomicTerm | literal
noLiteralTerm ::= noLiteralAtomicTerm | tripleTerm
term ::= noLiteralTerm | literal
reifier ::= subject
annotation ::= object
tripleTerm ::= transparentTripleTerm | opaqueTripleTerm
transparentTripleTerm ::= triple
opaqueTripleTerm ::= triple
Non context-free syntactic condition: A graph can not have two triples with the same annotation and distinct opaque triple terms.
RDF semantics is defined over the well formed fragment of RDF.
RDF semantics restricts interpretations as follows:
A RDF interpretation I
is a RDF model of a graph g
if and only if
-
∃ A . [I+A](g) = TRUE
and - all the RDF 1.1 metamodelling crap and
- all the RDF 1.1 axiomatic triples crap ⏩ and
∀ x,y1,y2 . (x,y1) ∈ IEXT(IS(rdf:isAnnotationOf)) ⋀ (x,y2) ∈ IEXT(IS(rdf:isAnnotationOf)) → y1=y2
and- more metamodelling crap and
- more axiomatic triples crap ⏪️
The set of all RDF models of a graph g
is called rdf-models(g)
.
RDF entailment: g ⊨ g'
if and only if rdf-models(g) ⊆ rdf-models(g')
.
- RDF 1.1 RDF semantics is the above without the parts within ⏩...⏪ marks.
- Observe that RDF 1.1 is always well formed.
Summary of the RDF-star WG wiki.
- Editor's guide
- Meeting minutes
- RDF terminology
- Scribes
- Use Cases collection
- RDF-star syntax and semantics:
- RDF-star "alternative baseline" (VOTED 2024.11.14 - frozen)
- RDF-star "liberal baseline" (current working version)
- RDF-star "minimal baseline" (VOTED 2024.07.18 - frozen - superseded by vote 2024.11.14 - deprecated)
- RDF-star "working baseline" (working version - deprecated)
- RDF‐star baseline examples
- RDF-star and LPGs
- Extending the baseline with "asserted" stuff
- systems and acronyms
- Task forces
- Text Direction considerations
- Text Direction Proposal
- Triple‐Edge-subgroup-proposals