From a00776d8f3cd0789e2fc25bb776c9c22d9813aeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <raphael.kubo.da.costa@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 19:17:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Use "local camera source" instead of "local video source".

See the discussion in w3c/ambient-light#83 -- "local video source" could end
up including screen capture sessions.
---
 index.bs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/index.bs b/index.bs
index ef2cfbd..c398d9c 100644
--- a/index.bs
+++ b/index.bs
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ Access to [=sensor readings=] are controlled by the Permissions API [[!PERMISSIO
 
 Note: in specific cases such as [[AMBIENT-LIGHT]], integration with the
 Permissions API is done indirectly -- illuminance readings are provided only
-when at least one local video [=source=] is not [=muted=] or [=stopped=]. By
+when at least one local camera [=source=] is not [=muted=] or [=stopped=]. By
 definition, that implies the <a permission>"camera"</a> permission has been granted.
 
 <h3 id="mitigation-strategies-case-by-case">Mitigation strategies applied on a case by case basis</h3>