Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move RDF Dataset Merge to RDF Semantics or RDF Concepts #155

Open
rubensworks opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Move RDF Dataset Merge to RDF Semantics or RDF Concepts #155

rubensworks opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
spec:substantive Change in the spec affecting its normative content (class 3) –see also spec:bug, spec:new-feature

Comments

@rubensworks
Copy link
Member

rubensworks commented Sep 18, 2024

As suggested by @gkellogg in #152 (comment), it would make sense to move the RDF Dataset Merge definition to RDF Semantics or Concepts, and reference it from the SPARQL query spec.

@rubensworks rubensworks added the spec:substantive Change in the spec affecting its normative content (class 3) –see also spec:bug, spec:new-feature label Sep 18, 2024
@rubensworks rubensworks changed the title Move RDF Dataset Merge to RDFS Move RDF Dataset Merge to RDF Semantics or RDF Concepts Sep 18, 2024
@rubensworks rubensworks added the needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting label Sep 24, 2024
@ktk ktk removed the needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting label Oct 31, 2024
@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Oct 31, 2024

Current definition of RDF Dataset Merge in section 18.1.1 RDF Dataset.

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Oct 31, 2024

Will be put into Section 10 of Semantics.

@pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

pchampin commented Nov 4, 2024

This was discussed during the rdf-star meeting on 31 October 2024.

View the transcript

Move RDF Dataset Merge to RDF Semantics or RDF Concepts 3

ktk: we can continue this offline

gkellogg: not a strong opinion, but RDF Semantics seems the right place for this definition
… this is currently defined in SPARQL Query

<gkellogg> #152 (comment)

<gb> Pull Request 152 Use RDF Dataset definition from RDF Concepts (by rubensworks) [spec:substantive]

pfps: I don't see a problem about putting it in RDF semantics
… it makes sense to have a section on dataset merging in semantics

<enrico> +1 to pfps (add to section 10)

pfps: graph merge is in semantics

<TallTed> +1 to putting Dataset Merge in same document as Graph Merge

<niklasl> https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/#sparqlDataset "Definition: RDF Dataset Merge"

<pfps> it would likely go in section 10.

<AndyS> https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/#sparqlDataset

pfps: don't close the issue until we have a proposed content

<enrico> Document RDF semantics section 4.1 Shared blank nodes, unions and merges

ktk: 5 min left, let's jump to AOB

enrico: I want to look at the writing in RDF 1.2 Semantics
… what's the process for updating the doc

ktk: Semantic TF tomorrow is also 1 hour earlier for the Europeans

<ktk> s/smenatics/semantics/


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:substantive Change in the spec affecting its normative content (class 3) –see also spec:bug, spec:new-feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants