-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move RDF Dataset Merge to RDF Semantics or RDF Concepts #155
Comments
Current definition of RDF Dataset Merge in section 18.1.1 RDF Dataset. |
Will be put into Section 10 of Semantics. |
This was discussed during the rdf-star meeting on 31 October 2024. View the transcriptMove RDF Dataset Merge to RDF Semantics or RDF Concepts 3ktk: we can continue this offline gkellogg: not a strong opinion, but RDF Semantics seems the right place for this definition <gkellogg> #152 (comment) <gb> Pull Request 152 Use RDF Dataset definition from RDF Concepts (by rubensworks) [spec:substantive] pfps: I don't see a problem about putting it in RDF semantics <enrico> +1 to pfps (add to section 10) pfps: graph merge is in semantics <TallTed> +1 to putting Dataset Merge in same document as Graph Merge <niklasl> https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/#sparqlDataset "Definition: RDF Dataset Merge" <pfps> it would likely go in section 10. <AndyS> https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/#sparqlDataset pfps: don't close the issue until we have a proposed content <enrico> Document RDF semantics section 4.1 Shared blank nodes, unions and merges ktk: 5 min left, let's jump to AOB enrico: I want to look at the writing in RDF 1.2 Semantics ktk: Semantic TF tomorrow is also 1 hour earlier for the Europeans <ktk> s/smenatics/semantics/ |
As suggested by @gkellogg in #152 (comment), it would make sense to move the RDF Dataset Merge definition to RDF Semantics or Concepts, and reference it from the SPARQL query spec.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: