-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CSS Backgrounds and Borders #885
Comments
I believe we're proposing https://wpt.fyi/results/css?label=experimental&label=master&aligned&q=path%3A%2Fcss%2Fcss-backgrounds%20or%20path%3A%2Fcss%2Fcss-borders%20or%20path%3A%2Fcss%2FCSS2%2Fbackgrounds%20or%20path%3A%2Fcss%2FCSS2%2Fborders%20not%20is%3Atentative here? |
The proposed test list above includes this test: ...which Firefox mostly fails, but not for any background/border-related reason; that's just a version of #867 where the test is doing something like |
The proposed test list also includes this test: So: this test should be excluded from this focus area, since its failure is just a limitation of the test itself, and doesn't represent an actual interop issue. (Ideally the test should be adjusted to get a fuzzy allowance, or redesigned to avoid having this rendering difference in the first place; but that test fixup doesn't really need to happen as part of the interop effort.) |
Description
There are various inconsistencies between browsers on how some kinds of borders and background render, and some newer features like background-clip: border-area/text that we should drive interop on. @smfr
This includes the following areas:
Specification
various
Additional Signals
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: