Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project unmaintained? #171

Open
brianjcohen opened this issue Jun 3, 2017 · 10 comments
Open

Project unmaintained? #171

brianjcohen opened this issue Jun 3, 2017 · 10 comments

Comments

@brianjcohen
Copy link

It seems the original author of this project may have moved on; the forks and pull requests are starting to pile up. Maybe @xndcn would be interested in turning the project over to a new maintainer(s) ?

I'm not much of a CoffeeScript expert but I'd be willing to help out. I rely heavily on this plugin and I'd hate to see it stop getting improvements.

@Joouis
Copy link

Joouis commented Jun 15, 2017

@brianjcohen Hey buddy, I'm interested in this project too, and already port it to my personal stuff. If you would like to code in ES6, maybe we can maintain it together ; )

@brianjcohen
Copy link
Author

@Joouis it might make more sense to hitch our wagons to this fork: https://github.com/nicolashainaux/symbols-tree-nav

@nicolashainaux
Copy link

@brianjcohen @Joouis Frankly I'd prefer to see symbols-tree-view alive again, merging new PR, enhancements, bug fixes...

I did publish a forked package because not much seems to happen since months now, and because such a reliable and at least up to date "class-navigator" feature is vital for my use of atom. Maybe the new features and bug corrections in symbols-tree-nav can be merged back to symbols-tree-view at some point in the future? In the meanwhile, PR, bug corrections and enhancements are welcome on symbols-tree-nav. I am not coffee script expert neither, and if anyone having better skills with it want to maintain it, it's open too.

By the way, there's an issue I had to reopen and cannot correct (actually cannot reproduce the bug), so any valuable information on it is welcome too (more details about if/how the bug can be reproduced etc.).

@onetrev
Copy link

onetrev commented Jul 5, 2017

There is also Symbols List, which might be an option too for now. A bit different than Symbols Tree View, but same general idea. Might work for some folks for now. Almost wish this overall functionality was built into Atom, it's such a key coding tool.

@Joinyy
Copy link

Joinyy commented Jul 20, 2017

@onetrev Yes I also wished it was part of atom core packages. Also because you can already browse symbols with Ctrl-R it should not be that big deal to display them in a nice dock.

@Joouis
Copy link

Joouis commented Sep 6, 2017

@brianjcohen @nicolashainaux @onetrev @Joinyy
Hey buddies, check structure-view out, hope you can enjoy it!

@nicolashainaux
Copy link

nicolashainaux commented Sep 6, 2017

Yes, it looks good! Moreover it's embedded in a dock at right, so it's resizeable.
The javascript files look better than in symbols-tree-nav/view, but the support for python is not enough.
I hope it'll support more languages soon.

@Joouis
Copy link

Joouis commented Sep 6, 2017

@nicolashainaux Of course I do have plan to support more and more popular languages like Python when I design the architecture of this plugin.
Javascript files look better because JS is my working choice now, so I started from JS, HTML and CSS.
More languages support need more efforts, I'm thinking about how to draw peoples' attention and get contributors in now.

@onetrev
Copy link

onetrev commented Sep 6, 2017

Hey @Joouis, this is very exciting! Thanks for the information. I had been looking for alternatives again just last week and unfortunately didn't notice your project.

As to how to get more peoples' attention, that is a tough one. I'm not sure how you get the folks at Atom to add something to the "Featured Packages" but in my mind yours should be a candidate for it. This is key and popular developer functionality, since Symbols Tree View has over 100K downloads, but since that package is only minimally updated now, folks need to know about the alternatives out there!

@brayfe
Copy link

brayfe commented Sep 26, 2019

Looks like there is still no maintainer for this project, 2 years later. I think this thread should now live as a place to list alternatives to this plugin. +1 for the idea that Atom includes this functionality as a core package.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants