Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workfile Template Create Load Placeholder: Prioritize loaders in list that match current host #1119

Open
2 tasks done
BigRoy opened this issue Feb 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks done
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition

Comments

@BigRoy
Copy link
Collaborator

BigRoy commented Feb 3, 2025

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues.

Please describe the feature you have in mind and explain what the current shortcomings are?

When Creating a Load Placeholder the amount of loaders to choose from is massive (it lists allow loaders, including global ones) which usually defaults to e.g. "Calculate Old Versions" because alphabetically it just happens to be the first entry.

Image

It makes it confusing and hard to find the host-specific loaders

How would you imagine the implementation of the feature?

When sorting the entries, prioritize those loaders for which the hosts attribute includes the currently registered host name. That way, host specific loaders are more likely to appear first.

Or - make those stand out in a different way.

Are there any labels you wish to add?

  • I have added the relevant labels to the enhancement request.

Describe alternatives you've considered:

Another approach would be to allow the Loader to be better descriptive in itself of whether it's actually loading something, or just happens to be triggering an action from the Loader. That way, we can limit the amount of entries shown in that dialog.

Additional context:

No response

@BigRoy BigRoy added the type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition label Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant