You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
For an experiment scaling the amplitude using real-time loops, the command table will use the increment amplitude argument.
In the interactive_psv simulation, however, the pulse will only be scaled to the value, which is supposed to be incremented instead of steadily increasing.
Here is a compiled_experiment, corresponding to a rabi, with increasing amplitude of the drive pulse. amplitude_increment.json
Versions used:
laboneq: 2.20
zhinst-core
others
Context
Do you know a workaround for the issue? If yes, please provide a short description.
Does the issue block your experiments?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@GlaserN we diagnosed the root cause of this issue, it is because the OutputSimulator be default does only analyze part of the sequencer code and not the full sequence, and therefore is not aware of the status of any increments.
We may adapt this in the future, but it may require a larger rework of the OutputSimulator.
QuantumClemens
changed the title
[BUG] - Pulse sheet simulator does not take amplitude increment into account
[FEATURE] - Pulse sheet simulator should take amplitude increment into account
Feb 14, 2024
Describe the bug
For an experiment scaling the amplitude using real-time loops, the command table will use the increment amplitude argument.
In the interactive_psv simulation, however, the pulse will only be scaled to the value, which is supposed to be incremented instead of steadily increasing.
Here is a compiled_experiment, corresponding to a rabi, with increasing amplitude of the drive pulse.
amplitude_increment.json
Versions used:
Context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: