Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Boost: Run the 404 tester when concatenate modules are enabled #41593

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

donnchawp
Copy link
Contributor

@donnchawp donnchawp commented Feb 6, 2025

Make sure to run the 404 tester each time either of the concatenate modules is enabled. This lets the plugin react more quickly to changes in wp-content/ in case mod_rewrite support has changed.

Fixes #

Proposed changes:

  • Added Activate trait to concatenate classes

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

pc9hqz-3kc-p2

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

  • Apply the PR
  • Add an error_log to the activate functions added to confirm they're called.
  • Toggle both concatenate modules off and on again.
  • Run tests with composer phpunit from projects/plugins/boost/

@donnchawp donnchawp added [Type] Bug When a feature is broken and / or not performing as intended [Status] Needs Team Review [Plugin] Boost A feature to speed up the site and improve performance. labels Feb 6, 2025
@donnchawp donnchawp added this to the boost/next milestone Feb 6, 2025
@donnchawp donnchawp requested a review from a team February 6, 2025 09:24
@donnchawp donnchawp self-assigned this Feb 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
    • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
      • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
      • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
    • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
      • For significant changes to core functionality.
      • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
    • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
      • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
      • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
  3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!


Boost plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: none scheduled.

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.

dilirity
dilirity previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2025
Copy link
Member

@dilirity dilirity left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We had this previously and we removed it. We're just adding it back in. :shipit:

On multisites or sites that can't call themselves this check may not
work correctly, so disable it by setting this constant
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Code Coverage Summary

No summary data is avilable for parent commit 7c65315, cannot calculate coverage changes. 😴

If that commit is a feature branch rather than a trunk commit, this is expected. Otherwise, you might try re-running the Tests / Publish coverage data job on this PR once the corresponding job on the trunk commit has succeeded.

Full summary · PHP report · JS report

@donnchawp donnchawp requested a review from dilirity February 6, 2025 15:08
Copy link
Contributor

@LiamSarsfield LiamSarsfield left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for adding back in the tester upon activation. Unit tests also pass locally for me 👍
Do/should we clear the scheduled cron/event if the user deactivates both the JS and CSS minify?

Copy link
Member

@dilirity dilirity left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work on this! Thanks for adding the tests.

Not sure if you knew this, but you can run tests from an individual file using this command:

composer phpunit --filter tests/php/lib/minify/test-functions-service.php

This will save you time while working on them in the future.

:shipit:

EDIT:

Do/should we clear the scheduled cron/event if the user deactivates both the JS and CSS minify?

@LiamSarsfield Yes we should. Good catch!

@dilirity dilirity merged commit 276eb07 into trunk Feb 7, 2025
65 of 66 checks passed
@dilirity dilirity deleted the update/boost/404-test-activate branch February 7, 2025 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Boost Feature] Minify [Plugin] Boost A feature to speed up the site and improve performance. [Tests] Includes Tests [Type] Bug When a feature is broken and / or not performing as intended
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants