Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simple jdbc example #2083

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Simple jdbc example #2083

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

Paultagoras
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This updates the JDBC example to use more generic JDBC methods.

Checklist

Delete items not relevant to your PR:

  • Closes issue
  • Unit and integration tests covering the common scenarios were added
  • A human-readable description of the changes was provided to include in CHANGELOG
  • For significant changes, documentation in https://github.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-docs was updated with further explanations or tutorials

Sorry, something went wrong.

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
Copy link
Member

@mshustov mshustov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chernser @Paultagoras @laeg Do we want to have snippets from https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/integrations/java/jdbc-driver as runnable examples?

@Paultagoras Paultagoras merged commit 2581f3b into main Jan 23, 2025
2 checks passed
@Paultagoras Paultagoras deleted the simple-jdbc-example branch January 23, 2025 01:51
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
38.5% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
5.3% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants