Fix doc/code mismatch on FINISH case 9.4

The doc expects UnexpectedRequest, before KEY_EXCHANGE. But the code only send VC without ALGORITHM. However, if VCA is used, then the error is SessionRequired. That also makes sense, because without KEY_EXCHANGE there is no session. As such, just fix the doc to match the code. Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]>
DMTF · Oct 26, 2023 · 09d3254 · 09d3254
1 parent 2ea0e8f
commit 09d3254
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/doc/9.FinishRsp.md b/doc/9.FinishRsp.md
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ Assertion 9.3.*.
 
 ### Case 9.4
 
-Description: SPDM responder shall return ERROR(UnexpectedRequest), if it receives a FINISH before KEY_EXCHANGE.
+Description: SPDM responder shall return ERROR(UnexpectedRequest), if it receives a FINISH before NEGOTIATE_ALGORITHMS.
 
 SPDM Version: 1.1+
 
@@ -141,8 +141,6 @@ TestSetup:
 4. Requester -> GET_CAPABILITIES {SPDMVersion=NegotiatedVersion, ...}
 5. CAPABILITIES <- Responder
 6. If Flags.KEY_EX_CAP == 0, then skip this case.
-7. Requester -> NEGOTIATE_ALGORITHMS {SPDMVersion=NegotiatedVersion, ...}
-8. ALGORITHMS <- Responder
 
 TestTeardown: None