Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(da_block_costs): remove Arc<Mutex<>> on shared_state and expose channel #2278

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

rymnc
Copy link
Member

@rymnc rymnc commented Oct 2, 2024

Linked Issues/PRs

Description

  • Exposed a broadcast::Sender as the shared_state of the DaBlockCostsSource, which is to be subscribed to when a service needs this dependency.

Checklist

  • Breaking changes are clearly marked as such in the PR description and changelog
  • New behavior is reflected in tests
  • The specification matches the implemented behavior (link update PR if changes are needed)

Before requesting review

  • I have reviewed the code myself
  • I have created follow-up issues caused by this PR and linked them here

After merging, notify other teams

[Add or remove entries as needed]

@rymnc rymnc self-assigned this Oct 2, 2024
@rymnc rymnc added the no changelog Skip the CI check of the changelog modification label Oct 2, 2024
@rymnc rymnc marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2024 10:43
@rymnc rymnc requested a review from a team October 2, 2024 10:43
Comment on lines 69 to 84
type SharedData = Sender<DaBlockCosts>;

type Task = Self;

type TaskParams = ();

fn shared_data(&self) -> Self::SharedData {}
fn shared_data(&self) -> Self::SharedData {
self.shared_state.clone()
}
Copy link
Member

@MitchTurner MitchTurner Oct 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't it make sense for

    type SharedData = Receiver<DaBlockCosts>;

and

    fn shared_data(&self) -> Self::SharedData {
        self.data_broadcaster.subscribe()
    }

Copy link
Member Author

@rymnc rymnc Oct 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Receiver<DaBlockCosts> doesn't implement Clone, whereas Sender is :)
we can generate a new subscription with a Sender of tokio::sync::broadcast

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunate. This is yet another example of why the RunnableService trait is a bad abstraction.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't get why it is bad, could you elaborate?=)

Copy link
Member

@MitchTurner MitchTurner Oct 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just, semantically, a Sender isn't shared data. It isn't even a means of getting shared data. It's the object that you need to expose to generate the object (a Receiver) by which you receive shared data.

So not only are we in blatant violation of SRP with the SharedState (see God Object), but we are also requiring the consumer to understand our underlying implementation, i.e. to get this data you must know the fields and the interfaces of the fields of the SharedData

Instead of having a shared_data() getter, we should just have a get_da_block_costs_receiver() method (this is kinda an ISP thing as well). But we are relying on an overly-generalized RunnableService abstraction that hides our business domain and requires us to rely on implementation details (as seen above).

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see where it is a God object.

The shared state is your object that has the get_da_block_costs_receiver method.

We can rename SharedState into ServiceAccessPoint.

Instead of exposing the service and implementing the get_da_block_costs_receiver on the service, we have an access point to the service via the SharedState. No one has access to the service except the service itself. All interactions with the service are done via its access point.

we are also requiring the consumer to understand our underlying implementation, i.e. to get this data you must know the fields and the interfaces of the fields of the SharedData

we should just have a get_da_block_costs_receiver() method

I don't see why you need to know the fields of the shared state... It is just an object with the get_da_block_costs_receiver method.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see where it is a God object.

Sorry. The God object point doesn't apply here. I was thinking about our txpool service SharedState I was looking at recently:

pub struct SharedState<
    PSProvider,
    ConsensusParamsProvider,
    GasPriceProvider,
    WasmChecker,
    MemoryPool,
> {
    pool: TxPool<PSProvider>,
    current_height: Arc<RwLock<BlockHeight>>,
    consensus_parameters_provider: Arc<ConsensusParamsProvider>,
    gas_price_provider: Arc<GasPriceProvider>,
    wasm_checker: Arc<WasmChecker>,
    memory: Arc<MemoryPool>,
    heavy_async_processor: Arc<HeavyAsyncProcessor>,
    utxo_validation: bool,
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All interactions with the service are done via its access point.

This should be "access points". And those access points should be defined by the domain of the service, not alllll possilbe services. When I'm saying we should have a get_da_block_costs_receiver() method, I'm saying that has a Single Responsiblility: providing a receiver.

Instead, we have to call service.shared_data().get_da_block_costs_receiver() and we have an arbitrary constraint that SharedData must be Clone, which isn't relevant here--we don't need to clone anything.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rymnc rymnc requested a review from a team October 2, 2024 15:58
Comment on lines 69 to 84
type SharedData = Sender<DaBlockCosts>;

type Task = Self;

type TaskParams = ();

fn shared_data(&self) -> Self::SharedData {}
fn shared_data(&self) -> Self::SharedData {
self.shared_state.clone()
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't get why it is bad, could you elaborate?=)

@@ -69,13 +66,15 @@ where
{
const NAME: &'static str = "DaBlockCostsService";

type SharedData = ();
type SharedData = Sender<DaBlockCosts>;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use a separate structure, please? This structure can provide a subscribe method that will return a receiver. In this case we don't expose sender to external world.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addressed in c0a47db

@rymnc rymnc force-pushed the chore/rework-block-committer-shared-state branch from c0a47db to 204b8a2 Compare October 3, 2024 06:27
Copy link
Collaborator

@xgreenx xgreenx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM=)

pub use anyhow::Result;

#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct DaBlockCostsSharedState(Sender<DaBlockCosts>);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think "DaBlockCosts" for service and shared state is redundant since it is already live inside of the v1::da_source_adapter.

Also I think "adapter" is overloads the ports and adapters. We don't use this property in context of this file. I think it just can be da_source or da_soruce_service.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure I understand, are you asking me to rename something?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay I re-read it ~ renaming it

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addressed in 0ad2191

sender: Sender<DaBlockCosts>,
poll_interval: Option<Duration>,
) -> Self {
pub fn new(source: Source, poll_interval: Option<Duration>) -> Self {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why poll_interval can be Option?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we want to specify a sensible default to poll the block committer

@rymnc rymnc requested review from MitchTurner and xgreenx October 3, 2024 09:35
@rymnc rymnc force-pushed the chore/rework-block-committer-shared-state branch from 0ad2191 to 5c80de0 Compare October 3, 2024 11:15
@rymnc rymnc merged commit 2d11df2 into master Oct 3, 2024
38 checks passed
@rymnc rymnc deleted the chore/rework-block-committer-shared-state branch October 3, 2024 14:19
@xgreenx xgreenx mentioned this pull request Oct 5, 2024
xgreenx added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2024
## Version v0.37.0

### Added
- [1609](#1609): Add DA
compression support. Compressed blocks are stored in the offchain
database when blocks are produced, and can be fetched using the GraphQL
API.
- [2290](#2290): Added a new
CLI argument `--graphql-max-directives`. The default value is `10`.
- [2195](#2195): Added
enforcement of the limit on the size of the L2 transactions per block
according to the `block_transaction_size_limit` parameter.
- [2131](#2131): Add flow in
TxPool in order to ask to newly connected peers to share their
transaction pool
- [2182](#2151): Limit number
of transactions that can be fetched via TxSource::next
- [2189](#2151): Select next
DA height to never include more than u16::MAX -1 transactions from L1.
- [2162](#2162): Pool
structure with dependencies, etc.. for the next transaction pool module.
Also adds insertion/verification process in PoolV2 and tests refactoring
- [2265](#2265): Integrate
Block Committer API for DA Block Costs.
- [2280](#2280): Allow comma
separated relayer addresses in cli
- [2299](#2299): Support blobs
in the predicates.
- [2300](#2300): Added new
function to `fuel-core-client` for checking whether a blob exists.

### Changed

#### Breaking
- [2299](#2299): Anyone who
wants to participate in the transaction broadcasting via p2p must
upgrade to support new predicates on the TxPool level.
- [2299](#2299): Upgraded
`fuel-vm` to `0.58.0`. More information in the
[release](https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-vm/releases/tag/v0.58.0).
- [2276](#2276): Changed how
complexity for blocks is calculated. The default complexity now is
80_000. All queries that somehow touch the block header now are more
expensive.
- [2290](#2290): Added a new
GraphQL limit on number of `directives`. The default value is `10`.
- [2206](#2206): Use timestamp
of last block when dry running transactions.
- [2153](#2153): Updated
default gas costs for the local testnet configuration to match
`fuel-core 0.35.0`.

## What's Changed
* fix: use core-test.fuellabs.net for dnsaddr resolution by @rymnc in
#2214
* Removed state transition bytecode from the local testnet by @xgreenx
in #2215
* Send whole transaction pool upon subscription to gossip by @AurelienFT
in #2131
* Update default gas costs based on 0.35.0 benchmarks by @xgreenx in
#2153
* feat: Use timestamp of last block when dry running transactions by
@netrome in #2206
* fix(dnsaddr_resolution): use fqdn separator to prevent suffixing by
dns resolvers by @rymnc in
#2222
* TransactionSource: specify maximum number of transactions to be
fetched by @acerone85 in #2182
* Implement worst case scenario for price algorithm v1 by @rafal-ch in
#2219
* chore(gas_price_service): define port for L2 data by @rymnc in
#2224
* Block producer selects da height to never exceed u64::MAX - 1
transactions from L1 by @acerone85 in
#2189
* Weekly `cargo update` by @github-actions in
#2236
* Use fees to calculate DA reward and avoid issues with Gwei/Wei
conversions by @MitchTurner in
#2229
* Protect against passing `i128::MIN` to `abs()` which causes overflow
by @rafal-ch in #2241
* Acquire `da_finalization_period` from the command line by @rafal-ch in
#2240
* Executor: test Tx_count limit with incorrect tx source by @acerone85
in #2242
* Minor updates to docs + a few typos fixed by @rafal-ch in
#2250
* chore(gas_price_service): move algorithm_updater to
fuel-core-gas-price-service by @rymnc in
#2246
* Use single heavy input in the `transaction_throughput.rs` benchmarks
by @xgreenx in #2205
* Enforce the block size limit by @rafal-ch in
#2195
* feat: build ARM and AMD in parallel by @mchristopher in
#2130
* Weekly `cargo update` by @github-actions in
#2268
* chore(gas_price_service): split into v0 and v1 and squash
FuelGasPriceUpdater type into GasPriceService by @rymnc in
#2256
* feat(gas_price_service): update block committer da source with
established contract by @rymnc in
#2265
* Use bytes from `unrecorded_blocks` rather from the block from DA by
@MitchTurner in #2252
* TxPool v2 General architecture by @AurelienFT in
#2162
* Add value delimiter and tests args by @AurelienFT in
#2280
* fix(da_block_costs): remove Arc<Mutex<>> on shared_state and expose
channel by @rymnc in #2278
* fix(combined_database): syncing auxiliary databases on startup with
custom behaviour by @rymnc in
#2272
* fix: Manually encode Authorization header for eventsource_client by
@Br1ght0ne in #2284
* Address `async-graphql` vulnerability by @MitchTurner in
#2290
* Update the WASM compatibility tests for `0.36` release by @rafal-ch in
#2271
* DA compression by @Dentosal in
#1609
* Use different port for every version compatibility test by @rafal-ch
in #2301
* Fix block query complexity by @xgreenx in
#2297
* Support blobs in predicates by @Voxelot in
#2299


**Full Changelog**:
v0.36.0...v0.37.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no changelog Skip the CI check of the changelog modification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants