-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add/Run/CI Clang-format on adoc/code #709
Conversation
78c8619
to
0f59af1
Compare
0f59af1
to
a3085ee
Compare
Ready to review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new format looks good to me! Any other opinions?
ForEachMacros: [ foreach, Q_FOREACH, BOOST_FOREACH ] | ||
SpaceBeforeParens: ControlStatements | ||
DisableFormat: false | ||
SortIncludes: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why repeating all the definitions used by default in the Google style?
Could you just keep the one which differ so we can understand the changes to the basic style?
I doubt we have ObjectiveC language constructs, so ObjCSpaceBeforeProtocolList
and others seem useless. 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed with 1a32f1
Ready to merge now, editorial. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Merging as editorial |
clang-format format
used by the CTS../adoc/code
files./adoc/code
are incorrectly formatted.We can use this PR to see if we like this
format-style
or want to customize it.Then, I can do another PR to do the same thing on all the other
code
blocks.