Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify that RandomFiller uses one random number #719

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Pennycook
Copy link
Contributor

This commit adjusts the RandomFiller example and its introduction in text to clarify that all elements of the buffer are initialized to the same random number, as opposed to generating a random number on each work-item.

Closes #198.

This commit adjusts the RandomFiller example and its introduction in text
to clarify that all elements of the buffer are initialized to the same random
number, as opposed to generating a random number on each work-item.
@Pennycook Pennycook added the editorial Some purely editorial problem label Feb 12, 2025
@Pennycook Pennycook requested review from keryell and gmlueck February 12, 2025 16:32
Copy link
Contributor

@tomdeakin tomdeakin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch - editorial fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial Some purely editorial problem
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Example from 4.12.1. Defining kernels as named function objects is misleading
3 participants