Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

storage: use exchange-based sequencing to broadcast internal commands #31147

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

teskje
Copy link
Contributor

@teskje teskje commented Jan 22, 2025

The Timely Sequencer doesn't behave well when different workers instantiate their parts at points in time that are sufficiently spread apart. It delays commands by that creation time difference and is prone to spinning the CPU at 100%.

To work around these issues, this PR replaces the Sequencer used in storage for broadcasting internal commands with a dataflow that sequences by sending all commands through a single worker.

Motivation

  • This PR fixes a recognized bug.

Fixes https://github.com/MaterializeInc/database-issues/issues/8893

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

The Timely `Sequencer` doesn't behave well when different workers
instantiate their parts at points in time that are sufficiently spread
apart. It delays commands by that creation time difference and is prone
to spinning the CPU at 100%.

To work around these issues, this commit replaces the `Sequencer` used
in storage for broadcasting internal commands with a dataflow that
sequences by sending all commands through a single worker.
@teskje teskje force-pushed the storage-exchange-sequencer branch 2 times, most recently from b53175b to 234a272 Compare January 23, 2025 16:12
The previous command sequencer dataflow relied on the assumption that
updates passing through Timely channels are not reordered. That isn't an
assumption we should make, so this commit adds code to explicitly track
and restore the correct ordering by assigning indexes to transmitted
commands and then making sure that no indexes are skipped downstream.
@teskje teskje force-pushed the storage-exchange-sequencer branch from 234a272 to 508f73d Compare January 23, 2025 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant