Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update microsoft-defender-endpoint-linux to remove reference to x86 #164

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

josecons-msft
Copy link
Contributor

Given that AMD64 and EM64T are in fact the implementation of x86-64, let's remove the 'x86_64' reference from this article, as it does generate some confusion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64

Given that AMD64 and EM64T are in fact the implementation of x86-64, let's remove the 'x86_64' reference from this article, as it does generate some confusion.
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 9ec3262:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
defender-endpoint/microsoft-defender-endpoint-linux.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@josecons-msft
Copy link
Contributor Author

Forgot to mention that the confusion part comes from the 'x86' reference, i.e., some people will assume this means 32 bits is supported.

Copy link
Contributor

@denisebmsft denisebmsft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @josecons-msft

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 7e4c57c:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
defender-endpoint/microsoft-defender-endpoint-linux.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@denisebmsft denisebmsft merged commit c8917d4 into MicrosoftDocs:public Jan 2, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants