Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qemu_v8: fix "SCMI_DTB" with QEMU v9.2.0 #807

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vingu-linaro
Copy link
Contributor

Commit 1977c37 ("qemu_v8: support new path to QEMU v9.2.0") allows QEMU v9.2.0 to be used for 'make run[-only]', but it does not take into account 'make $(SCMI_DTB)'.

Copy link
Contributor

@etienne-lms etienne-lms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the commit message: "'make $(SCMI_DTB)'" seems as strange command line. Should it rather be "'make all WITH_SCMI=y'"?

@vingu-linaro
Copy link
Contributor Author

For the commit message: "'make $(SCMI_DTB)'" seems as strange command line. Should it rather be "'make all WITH_SCMI=y'"?

only the $(SCMI_DTB): has not been updated jens updated the run: and jerome fixed the check:
The commit message is a copy/paste/replace of 0264ae3d

Copy link
Contributor

@jforissier jforissier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please reword:

but it does not take into account 'make $(SCMI_DTB)'.
and use instead:
but it does not update the $(SCMI_DTB) recipe.

With that:

Reviewed-by: Jerome Forissier <[email protected]>

Commit 1977c37 ("qemu_v8: support new path to QEMU v9.2.0") allows
QEMU v9.2.0 to be used for 'make run[-only]', but it does not update the
$(SCMI_DTB) recipe.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jerome Forissier <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants